[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$apiParty6fBuHLCPZ1LTYs42XHdVbjpSDOYYPYzyxeAGwSN5Tp8":3,"$apiPartyuurIl_CEmiAcaYQIoWv9z3AkW5h7fl4oB0JYb6s1Zj0":563,"$apiPartyuurIl_CEmiAcaYQIoWv9z3AkW5h7fl4oB0JYb6s1Zj0$H93EERW16b":563},{"product_data":4,"scene_data":21,"task_data":407,"modality_data":441,"domain_data":478},[5,9,12,15,18],{"name":6,"value":7,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Rivo","1","",{"name":10,"value":11,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Cubo","2",{"name":13,"value":14,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Moye","3",{"name":16,"value":17,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Juro","4",{"name":19,"value":20,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Ordo","5",[22,73,135,197,232,267,302,337,372],{"name":23,"value":7,"add_value":24,"describe":25,"children":26},"Home & Indoor","sofa","AI enhances everyday home life. Our datasets cover real indoor scenes to support smart devices, robotics, and home intelligence.",[27,29,31,33,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":28,"value":7},"Living Room",{"name":30,"value":11},"Bedroom",{"name":32,"value":14},"Kitchen",{"name":34,"value":17},"Dining Area",{"name":36,"value":20},"Bathroom",{"name":38,"value":39},"Entrance \u002F Foyer","6",{"name":41,"value":42},"Corridor \u002F Hallway","7",{"name":44,"value":45},"Staircase","8",{"name":47,"value":48},"Home Office","9",{"name":50,"value":51},"Hobby \u002F Game Room","10",{"name":53,"value":54},"Worship Space","11",{"name":56,"value":57},"Garage","12",{"name":59,"value":60},"Utility \u002F Laundry Room","13",{"name":62,"value":63},"Pantry","14",{"name":65,"value":66},"Basement","15",{"name":68,"value":69},"Garden","16",{"name":71,"value":72},"Balcony","17",{"name":74,"value":11,"add_value":75,"describe":76,"children":77},"Office & Educational","workshop","AI is reshaping work and learning. Our datasets capture offices and classrooms to power automation and next-generation productivity tools.",[78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99,102,105,108,111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132],{"name":79,"value":80},"Open Office","18",{"name":82,"value":83},"Private Office","19",{"name":85,"value":86},"Co-working Space","20",{"name":88,"value":89},"Reception \u002F Lobby","21",{"name":91,"value":92},"Conference Room","22",{"name":94,"value":95},"Huddle Room \u002F Booth","23",{"name":97,"value":98},"Lecture Hall \u002F Auditorium","24",{"name":100,"value":101},"Classroom","25",{"name":103,"value":104},"Science Laboratory","26",{"name":106,"value":107},"Library","27",{"name":109,"value":110},"Design Studio","28",{"name":112,"value":113},"Pantry \u002F Breakroom","29",{"name":115,"value":116},"Cafeteria \u002F Canteen","30",{"name":118,"value":119},"Restroom (Commercial)","31",{"name":121,"value":122},"Gymnasium \u002F Sports Hall","32",{"name":124,"value":125},"Server Room","33",{"name":127,"value":128},"Mailroom \u002F Logistics","34",{"name":130,"value":131},"Janitorial Closet","35",{"name":133,"value":134},"Corridor \u002F Elevators","36",{"name":136,"value":14,"add_value":137,"describe":138,"children":139},"Healthcare & Medical","love-and-help","AI is advancing modern healthcare. Our datasets include clinics and hospitals to enable clinical insights and medical automation.",[140,143,146,149,152,155,158,161,164,167,170,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194],{"name":141,"value":142},"Operating Theatre \u002F OR","37",{"name":144,"value":145},"Consultation Room","38",{"name":147,"value":148},"Treatment Room","39",{"name":150,"value":151},"Dental Clinic","40",{"name":153,"value":154},"Inpatient Ward","41",{"name":156,"value":157},"Nurse Station","42",{"name":159,"value":160},"ICU","43",{"name":162,"value":163},"NICU (Neonatal ICU)","44",{"name":165,"value":166},"Emergency Room (ER)","45",{"name":168,"value":169},"Hospital Corridor","46",{"name":171,"value":172},"Waiting Area","47",{"name":174,"value":175},"CT\u002FMRI","48",{"name":177,"value":178},"Medical Laboratory","49",{"name":180,"value":181},"Phlebotomy Room","50",{"name":183,"value":184},"Rehabilitation Gym","51",{"name":186,"value":187},"Assisted Living Room","52",{"name":189,"value":190},"Pharmacy","53",{"name":192,"value":193},"Sterile Processing Dept","54",{"name":195,"value":196},"Medical Storage","55",{"name":198,"value":17,"add_value":199,"describe":200,"children":201},"Business & Public Service","business","AI is elevating commercial and public services. Our datasets span retail, dining, and service centers to improve intelligent operations.",[202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229],{"name":203,"value":204},"Shopping Mall Atrium","86",{"name":206,"value":207},"Supermarket Shelf","87",{"name":209,"value":210},"Self-Checkout Counter","88",{"name":212,"value":213},"Restaurant Dining Hall","89",{"name":215,"value":216},"Commercial Kitchen","90",{"name":218,"value":219},"Hotel Lobby","91",{"name":221,"value":222},"Subway Platform","92",{"name":224,"value":225},"Security Checkpoint","93",{"name":227,"value":228},"Underground Parking","94",{"name":230,"value":231},"Bank Teller Zone","95",{"name":233,"value":20,"add_value":234,"describe":235,"children":236},"Industrial & Manufacturing","robot-arm","AI is modernizing industry. Our datasets capture factories and logistics spaces to support robotics and intelligent manufacturing.",[237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264],{"name":238,"value":239},"Final Assembly Line","96",{"name":241,"value":242},"Quality Control Station","97",{"name":244,"value":245},"Robotic Welding Cell","98",{"name":247,"value":248},"CNC Machining Center","99",{"name":250,"value":251},"Cleanroom","100",{"name":253,"value":254},"Automated Warehouse","101",{"name":256,"value":257},"Loading Dock","102",{"name":259,"value":260},"Sorting Center","103",{"name":262,"value":263},"Chemical Plant","104",{"name":265,"value":266},"Power Substation","105",{"name":268,"value":39,"add_value":269,"describe":270,"children":271},"Transportation & Driving","car","AI is revolutionizing mobility. Our datasets capture road networks, vehicle dynamics and traffic scenarios to support autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems.",[272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299],{"name":273,"value":274},"Urban Intersection","56",{"name":276,"value":277},"Highway \u002F Expressway","57",{"name":279,"value":280},"Tunnel","58",{"name":282,"value":283},"Roundabout","59",{"name":285,"value":286},"School \u002F Hospital Zone","60",{"name":288,"value":289},"Toll Station","61",{"name":291,"value":292},"Construction Zone","62",{"name":294,"value":295},"Parking Garage","63",{"name":297,"value":298},"Driver Cabin","64",{"name":300,"value":301},"Adverse Weather","65",{"name":303,"value":42,"add_value":304,"describe":305,"children":306},"Outdoor & Construction","tent-tree","AI is optimizing outdoor operations. Our datasets capture construction sites, open-air work zones and outdoor infrastructure to support smart construction and autonomous outdoor machinery.",[307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334],{"name":308,"value":309},"Excavation Site","66",{"name":311,"value":312},"Scaffolding Area","67",{"name":314,"value":315},"Material Storage Yard","68",{"name":317,"value":318},"Site Entrance","69",{"name":320,"value":321},"Roadwork Zone","70",{"name":323,"value":324},"Bridge Infrastructure","71",{"name":326,"value":327},"Transmission Line","72",{"name":329,"value":330},"Open-pit Mine","73",{"name":332,"value":333},"Tunneling Site","74",{"name":335,"value":336},"Post-Disaster Rubble","75",{"name":338,"value":45,"add_value":339,"describe":340,"children":341},"Nature, Aerial & Aquatic","global-loop","AI is exploring the natural world. Our datasets capture terrestrial landscapes, aerial vistas and aquatic ecosystems to support environmental monitoring and autonomous exploration systems.",[342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369],{"name":343,"value":344},"Deep Forest","76",{"name":346,"value":347},"Farmland \u002F Crops","77",{"name":349,"value":350},"River \u002F Lake","78",{"name":352,"value":353},"Open Ocean","79",{"name":355,"value":356},"Underwater Coral Reef","80",{"name":358,"value":359},"Fish Farm","81",{"name":361,"value":362},"Mountain Terrain","82",{"name":364,"value":365},"Urban Low Altitude","83",{"name":367,"value":368},"Fire Scene","84",{"name":370,"value":371},"Desert \u002F Gobi","85",{"name":373,"value":48,"add_value":374,"describe":375,"children":376},"Virtul & Digital","siri","AI is reshaping the virtual realm. Our datasets capture digital twins, virtual environments and simulated spaces to support metaverse development and intelligent digital interaction.",[377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404],{"name":378,"value":379},"VR Social Space","106",{"name":381,"value":382},"Synthetic Driving Sim","107",{"name":384,"value":385},"Digital Twin City","108",{"name":387,"value":388},"FPS \u002F MOBA Game","109",{"name":390,"value":391},"Robotics Gym","110",{"name":393,"value":394},"AR Navigation","111",{"name":396,"value":397},"Virtual Showroom","112",{"name":399,"value":400},"Code \u002F IDE Interface","113",{"name":402,"value":403},"App GUI Screen","114",{"name":405,"value":406},"Synthetic Face\u002FID","115",[408,411,414,417,420,423,426,429,432,435,438],{"name":409,"value":7,"add_value":410,"describe":8},"Classification","rubric",{"name":412,"value":11,"add_value":413,"describe":8},"Detection","radar",{"name":415,"value":14,"add_value":416,"describe":8},"Segmentation","segmentation",{"name":418,"value":17,"add_value":419,"describe":8},"Tacking","crosshairs",{"name":421,"value":20,"add_value":422,"describe":8},"Estimation","streamline",{"name":424,"value":39,"add_value":425,"describe":8},"QA","qa",{"name":427,"value":42,"add_value":428,"describe":8},"Recognition","finger-scan",{"name":430,"value":45,"add_value":431,"describe":8},"Control","control",{"name":433,"value":48,"add_value":434,"describe":8},"Extraction","extraction",{"name":436,"value":51,"add_value":437,"describe":8},"Retrieval","retrieval",{"name":439,"value":54,"add_value":440,"describe":8},"Forecast","forecast",[442,445,448,451,454,457,460,463,466,469,472,475],{"name":443,"value":7,"add_value":444,"describe":8},"Audio","audio",{"name":446,"value":11,"add_value":447,"describe":8},"Image","image",{"name":449,"value":14,"add_value":450,"describe":8},"Text","text",{"name":452,"value":17,"add_value":453,"describe":8},"Video","video",{"name":455,"value":20,"add_value":456,"describe":8},"Multi","multi",{"name":458,"value":39,"add_value":459,"describe":8},"Document","document",{"name":461,"value":42,"add_value":462,"describe":8},"Time-Series","time-series",{"name":464,"value":45,"add_value":465,"describe":8},"3D cloud","cloud",{"name":467,"value":48,"add_value":468,"describe":8},"Code","code",{"name":470,"value":51,"add_value":471,"describe":8},"Event","event",{"name":473,"value":54,"add_value":474,"describe":8},"Motion","motion",{"name":476,"value":57,"add_value":477,"describe":8},"Interaction","interaction",[479,482,487,491,494,499,504,509,514,519,524,528,532,536,540,544,548,552,556,559],{"id":480,"value":480,"name":233,"intro":481,"add_value":234,"describe":481},2,"智能质检：利用图像识别、多模态模型对产品外观或声音、振动等数据进行分析，自动识别缺陷，提高质量控制效率。\n工业知识问答与文档理解：通过大模型理解和总结技术文档、操作手册，实现快速问答、知识检索和培训支持。\n安全监测与风险预警：实时分析视频、传感器和操作日志，识别潜在危险行为或异常状态，提前预警，保障人员和设备安全。",{"id":483,"value":483,"name":484,"intro":485,"add_value":486,"describe":485},3,"Finance & Insurance","风险评估与预测：分析大量客户数据，评估信用风险、市场风险等，预测违约概率、股价走势等，辅助金融机构决策。\n智能投顾：根据客户风险偏好、资产状况等，提供个性化投资组合建议，实时调整投资策略。\n反欺诈检测：通过分析交易数据、用户行为，识别异常交易和欺诈行为，保障金融安全。","funds",{"id":488,"value":488,"name":489,"intro":490,"add_value":269,"describe":490},1,"Transport & Automotive","智能座舱：打造多模态交互的 AI 座舱，通过语音、手势、面部识别等实现人机交互，如语音控制导航、音乐播放。\n驾驶员状态监测：识别疲劳、分心、抽烟、打电话等行为，通过大模型判断危险等级，触发相应提醒或干预机制。\n智能驾驶：AI 用于环境感知、路径规划与决策控制，使车辆能识别道路、行人、障碍物等，实现自适应巡航、自动泊车、车道保持等功能，提升驾驶安全性与便利性。",{"id":492,"value":492,"name":136,"intro":493,"add_value":137,"describe":493},4,"医学影像诊断：分析 CT、MRI 等影像，辅助医生检测疾病、识别病灶，如 AI 系统可快速发现肺部结节。\n医患对话助手：通过自然语言处理理解患者问题，提供初步健康建议或就诊指导，缓解医生接诊压力。\n智能健康管理：根据用户健康数据，提供个性化健康建议、疾病预警，如智能手环结合 AI 分析用户运动、睡眠、心率等数据。",{"id":495,"value":495,"name":496,"intro":497,"add_value":498,"describe":497},6,"Smart Devices","多模态交互：支持语音、手势、眼神等多种交互方式，如 AI 眼镜可通过语音指令实现翻译、搜索功能。\n智能感知与处理：使设备能感知环境、理解用户需求，如智能音箱根据环境噪音自动调节音量。\n个性化服务：根据用户使用习惯和偏好，提供个性化功能与服务，如智能手表为用户定制运动健身计划。","microscope",{"id":500,"value":500,"name":501,"intro":502,"add_value":503,"describe":502},8,"Law & Government","智能法律问答：面向公众或企业用户，提供合规、劳动法、婚姻继承、知识产权等常见法律问题的智能解答。\n合同审查与风险识别：利用大模型分析合同内容，识别潜在风险条款、漏洞或不合理约定，提升合同审核质量。\n法律知识图谱构建：自动梳理法规、案例、条文之间的引用关系，构建语义化知识图谱，支持智能分析和推理。","hammer",{"id":505,"value":505,"name":506,"intro":507,"add_value":508,"describe":507},7,"Education & Training","个性化学习：根据学生学习进度、能力和知识掌握情况，推送个性化学习内容与练习，如智能辅导系统为学生制定专属学习计划。\n智能教学辅助：AI 助教协助教师进行作业批改、答疑解惑，还可分析教学数据，为教师提供教学反馈，优化教学方法。\n虚拟学习环境：利用 AI 创建虚拟实验、历史场景等，让学生沉浸式学习，如在虚拟化学实验室中进行实验操作。","degree-hat",{"id":510,"value":510,"name":511,"intro":512,"add_value":513,"describe":512},5,"Agriculture & Food","作物病虫害识别与防治：通过图像识别分析农作物叶片、果实等症状，识别病虫害类型，给出防治建议，减少产量损失。\n农产品质量检测：利用图像和传感器数据，识别果蔬等农产品的成熟度、外观缺陷，进行自动分级，提高市场竞争力。\n农情监测与预测：利用卫星遥感、气象和传感器数据，结合大模型预测作物长势、干旱、洪涝等农情变化。","ph-farm",{"id":515,"value":515,"name":516,"intro":517,"add_value":518,"describe":517},9,"Retail & E-commerce","智能客服：通过自然语言对话理解用户需求，提供产品推荐、订单查询、退换货支持等服务，提升客户满意度。\n个性化营销推荐：基于用户浏览、购买、偏好等行为数据，生成个性化推荐内容与优惠策略，提高转化率和客单价。\n商品内容生成：自动撰写商品标题、卖点描述、使用说明等内容，适用于海量SKU的内容生产与多语言发布。","buy",{"id":520,"value":520,"name":521,"intro":522,"add_value":523,"describe":8},10,"Security & Protection",null,"safe-shield-line",{"id":525,"value":525,"name":526,"intro":522,"add_value":527,"describe":8},11,"Environment & Climate","weather",{"id":529,"value":529,"name":530,"intro":522,"add_value":531,"describe":8},12,"Energy & Resource","energy-leaf",{"id":533,"value":533,"name":534,"intro":522,"add_value":535,"describe":8},13,"Express & Logistics","speed-outline",{"id":537,"value":537,"name":538,"intro":522,"add_value":539,"describe":8},15,"Sports","baseball-outline",{"id":541,"value":541,"name":542,"intro":522,"add_value":543,"describe":8},16,"General Data","daily-booth",{"id":545,"value":545,"name":546,"intro":522,"add_value":547,"describe":8},17,"Content & Media","media",{"id":549,"value":549,"name":550,"intro":522,"add_value":551,"describe":8},18,"Construction","construction",{"id":553,"value":553,"name":554,"intro":522,"add_value":555,"describe":8},19,"IT & Telecom","tech",{"id":557,"value":557,"name":558,"intro":522,"add_value":498,"describe":8},20,"Science & Research",{"id":560,"value":560,"name":561,"intro":522,"add_value":562,"describe":8},21,"Language & Culture","lang",{"id":564,"unique_code":565,"title":566,"icon":8,"intro":567,"cate":483,"detail":568,"create_time":569,"update_time":570,"price":571,"view_count":515,"download_count":572,"unit":572,"amount":573,"is_create_order":572,"enterprise_id":488,"seo_keywords":574,"seo_description":575,"data_format":576,"file_size":577,"apply_scene":578,"training_task":579,"version":580,"dataset_type_id":492,"dataset_scene_id":500,"sample_file":581,"banner":8,"unit_name":8,"cate_name":449,"icon_url":8,"banner_url":8,"sample_file_url":8,"data_dict":582,"qa_list":635,"sample_metadatas":652,"text_sample_content":697,"enterprise_name":698,"enterprise_logo":699,"data_distribution":700},1237,"c23bb0434957a3373fde8a4cdd998181","Legal Professional Qualification Examination Case-Based QA Dataset","Train and evaluate legal question answering with structured links between case facts, legal rules, reasoning, and conclusions.","\u003Cp>This dataset brings together case questions, statutory application questions, answer options, answers, and explanations from legal qualification exam and legal studies practice pages. It covers substantive law, procedural rules, and integrated case analysis, while linking case facts and legal elements to applicable rules, reasoning, and conclusions. It is designed for legal-domain question answering, case-reasoning evaluation, and specialized legal knowledge retrieval.\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-15 18:05:21","2026-10-19 17:19:34","0.00",0,5000,"legal exam dataset,legal case QA,law exam question bank,legal case analysis,legal question answering,statutory application training,legal reasoning data,legal LLM training","Case-based legal exam data linking facts, legal elements, rules, reasoning, and conclusions for legal QA training and case-reasoning evaluation.","JSON","0.3GB","legal professional examination preparation, legal case analysis, legal education and training","legal question answering, case-based reasoning, legal rule application","V1.0","rivo\u002Fsample-packages\u002Fb13adb44-6e4e-4aec-8e9e-423c3b368fbf\u002F20261015.zip",[583,588,594,599,604,610,615,620,625,630],{"id":572,"name":584,"field":585,"intro":586,"type":587},"File Name","file_name","File name","string",{"id":589,"name":590,"field":591,"intro":592,"type":593},9023,"Legal Rules","legal_rules","Legal provisions, constituent elements, conditions for application, and supporting legal authorities extracted from the question and explanation.","array",{"id":595,"name":596,"field":597,"intro":598,"type":587},9024,"Legal Domain","legal_domain","The primary branch or specialized area of law inferred from the case facts, question, and explanation.",{"id":600,"name":601,"field":602,"intro":603,"type":587},9025,"Question Type","question_type","The case question category inferred from its content, such as substantive law application, procedural law judgment, statutory interpretation, or integrated analysis.",{"id":605,"name":606,"field":607,"intro":608,"type":609},9026,"Original Case Record","source_record","The original case question-and-answer content collected from a legal exam or law practice page, serving as the independent source for this record.","object",{"id":611,"name":612,"field":613,"intro":614,"type":593},9027,"Relevant Facts and Elements","facts_elements","Facts, conduct elements, relationships between parties, and outcome elements extracted from the case that directly affect the legal judgment.",{"id":616,"name":617,"field":618,"intro":619,"type":593},9028,"Legal Reasoning Chain","reasoning_chain","The case reasoning organized by relevant facts, legal rules, rule application, and intermediate conclusions, preserving the links between facts and conclusions.",{"id":621,"name":622,"field":623,"intro":624,"type":587},9029,"Final Answer and Conclusion","answer_conclusion","The final legal judgment or correct answer choice derived from the facts, legal rules, and reasoning chain.",{"id":626,"name":627,"field":628,"intro":629,"type":593},9030,"Procedural Issues","procedural_issues","Procedural law issues identified in the case, such as jurisdiction, standing, deadlines, evidence, procedural steps, or available remedies.",{"id":631,"name":632,"field":633,"intro":634,"type":593},9031,"Boundary Conditions","boundary_conditions","Exceptions, limitations, counterexamples, and easily confused scenarios that may affect the scope or outcome of applying a legal rule.",[636,640,644,648],{"id":637,"question":638,"answer":639},6399,"What does the dataset contain?","It includes case questions, statutory application questions, answer options, answers, and explanations from legal exam and law practice pages. Records also organize question type, legal domain, relevant facts, rules, reasoning, conclusions, procedural issues, and boundary conditions.",{"id":641,"question":642,"answer":643},6400,"Which capabilities can this data support?","It can support training in legal question answering, case fact analysis, application of legal rules, procedural issue identification, and conclusion generation. It can also help evaluate how models handle specialized concepts, procedural rules, and easily confused boundary cases.",{"id":645,"question":646,"answer":647},6401,"How can I obtain the data, and what should I check before using it?","Refer to the product page for the available delivery format, access method, and license terms. Since the material is sourced from exam and practice pages, verify the applicable license before using it in teaching, research, or commercial projects, and check answers against current laws and regulations.",{"id":649,"question":650,"answer":651},6402,"Can the answers be treated as legal advice for real cases?","No. The dataset is intended primarily for exam preparation, model training, and capability evaluation. Answers reflect the facts and legal sources specified in each exercise; real cases require review of the full circumstances, jurisdiction, and current law by a qualified professional.",[653,670,684],{"id":654,"relate_table":655,"relate_id":656,"file_size":572,"file_name":657,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":658,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":659,"cate_name":660,"legal_rules":661,"legal_domain":662,"question_type":663,"source_record":664,"facts_elements":665,"reasoning_chain":666,"answer_conclusion":667,"procedural_issues":668,"boundary_conditions":669},15111,"union_cubo",2050313748,"样例_3.json","json","{\"legal_rules\": \"[{\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"If the parties have reached an arbitration agreement, and one party files a lawsuit with a People's Court without stating the existence of the arbitration agreement, after the People's Court accepts the case, if the other party submits the arbitration agreement before the first hearing, the People's Court shall dismiss the lawsuit; if the other party does not raise an objection to the People's Court's acceptance before the first hearing, it is deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court shall continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"A valid arbitration agreement exists; the defendant must raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court in order to request the People's Court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\\\"}, {\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"A People's Court will not, merely because an arbitration agreement exists, transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio; whether litigation jurisdiction is excluded depends on whether a party timely raises an objection according to law and whether the arbitration agreement is valid.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and the jurisdictional rules for arbitration agreements\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"Only when the arbitration agreement is valid and the defendant raises an objection within the statutory time will the court review according to law and handle accordingly; if no objection is raised within the time limit, the procedural consequence of waiving the arbitration agreement arises.\\\"}]\", \"legal_domain\": \"Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law\", \"question_type\": \"Procedural Law Determination\", \"source_record\": \"{\\\"case_text\\\": \\\"Company A and Company B signed a sales contract for goods, agreeing to submit disputes arising from the contract to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration. Later, Company A filed a lawsuit regarding a payment dispute with the Haidian District People's Court of Beijing. After receiving the complaint materials, Company B in its answer made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment, and did not raise an arbitration agreement defense before the first hearing. Only at the first hearing did Company B raise that the parties had an arbitration agreement and request the court to transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission.\\\", \\\"question_text\\\": \\\"How should the Haidian District People's Court handle the lawsuit filed by Company A?\\\", \\\"options\\\": [{\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"A\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"As long as an arbitration agreement exists, the court must dismiss the lawsuit ex officio\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"B\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"Company B did not raise an objection before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the court should continue to hear the case\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"C\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The court should transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for hearing\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"D\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"After Company A filed the lawsuit, the arbitration agreement is naturally invalid, and the court should directly make a substantive judgment\\\"}], \\\"answer_text\\\": \\\"B. Company B did not raise an objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"explanation_text\\\": \\\"The parties agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission, the arbitration institution can be determined, and the existing facts show that the arbitration agreement is valid. After Company A sued, if Company B wished to exclude court jurisdiction based on the arbitration agreement, it should have raised an objection before the first hearing of the People's Court. Company B made only substantive defenses and raised the arbitration agreement defense only at the first hearing, which exceeded the time for raising an objection. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution ex officio.\\\"}\", \"facts_elements\": \"[\\\"Company A and Company B agreed in the sales contract to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration\\\", \\\"Company A filed a lawsuit regarding the payment dispute with a People's Court having jurisdictional connection\\\", \\\"After receiving the litigation materials, Company B made only substantive defenses\\\", \\\"Company B did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court\\\", \\\"Company B raised the request to transfer to arbitration only at the first hearing\\\"]\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"[{\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"The contract agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration, and the name of the arbitration institution can be determined.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A valid arbitration agreement in principle excludes the People's Court's litigation jurisdiction over the same dispute, but the statutory objection procedure should apply.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"The arbitration institution agreed in this case is clear, and the facts do not show any ground for invalidity of the arbitration agreement, so it should be regarded as a valid arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"The case has the premise for applying the jurisdictional rules of an arbitration agreement.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"Company B made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment in its answer and did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"The defendant should raise an arbitration agreement objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing of the People's Court.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"Company B had already participated in the substantive dispute but did not assert the arbitration agreement within the statutory time, indicating that it did not timely request the court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"Company B raised the arbitration agreement defense after the time limit.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"Company B requested transfer of the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission only at the first hearing.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"If no objection is raised before the first hearing, it is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"Company B's request at the first hearing was later than the statutory objection period, and it could no longer require the court to transfer the case based on the arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"The People's Court should continue to hear Company A's claims rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution.\\\"}]\", \"answer_conclusion\": \"Option B is correct. Although a valid arbitration agreement existed in the contract, Company B did not raise a jurisdictional objection before the first hearing, but raised it only at the first hearing. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the Haidian District People's Court should continue to hear the case.\", \"procedural_issues\": \"[\\\"Whether the arbitration agreement is valid and whether the arbitration institution can be determined\\\", \\\"The statutory time for the defendant to raise an arbitration agreement objection, that is, before the first hearing\\\", \\\"The procedural effect of failing to raise an objection within the time limit on the court's litigation jurisdiction and the validity of the arbitration agreement\\\", \\\"Whether the People's Court has the power to transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio\\\"]\", \"boundary_conditions\": \"[\\\"If Company B had raised a valid arbitration agreement before the first hearing and objected to the court's acceptance on that basis, the People's Court would generally dismiss the lawsuit according to law, except where the arbitration agreement is invalid, among other circumstances.\\\", \\\"If the arbitration agreement does not specify arbitration matters or does not specify a clear arbitration institution, it may not exclude the People's Court's jurisdiction because it lacks the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"If the defendant did not participate in substantive defense and timely raised an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing, it cannot be deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement merely because the plaintiff has already filed a lawsuit.\\\"]\"}","文本","[{\"rule_text\": \"If the parties have reached an arbitration agreement, and one party files a lawsuit with a People's Court without stating the existence of the arbitration agreement, after the People's Court accepts the case, if the other party submits the arbitration agreement before the first hearing, the People's Court shall dismiss the lawsuit; if the other party does not raise an objection to the People's Court's acceptance before the first hearing, it is deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court shall continue to hear the case.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China\", \"application_condition\": \"A valid arbitration agreement exists; the defendant must raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court in order to request the People's Court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\"}, {\"rule_text\": \"A People's Court will not, merely because an arbitration agreement exists, transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio; whether litigation jurisdiction is excluded depends on whether a party timely raises an objection according to law and whether the arbitration agreement is valid.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and the jurisdictional rules for arbitration agreements\", \"application_condition\": \"Only when the arbitration agreement is valid and the defendant raises an objection within the statutory time will the court review according to law and handle accordingly; if no objection is raised within the time limit, the procedural consequence of waiving the arbitration agreement arises.\"}]","Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law","Procedural Law Determination","{\"case_text\": \"Company A and Company B signed a sales contract for goods, agreeing to submit disputes arising from the contract to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration. Later, Company A filed a lawsuit regarding a payment dispute with the Haidian District People's Court of Beijing. After receiving the complaint materials, Company B in its answer made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment, and did not raise an arbitration agreement defense before the first hearing. Only at the first hearing did Company B raise that the parties had an arbitration agreement and request the court to transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission.\", \"question_text\": \"How should the Haidian District People's Court handle the lawsuit filed by Company A?\", \"options\": [{\"option_label\": \"A\", \"option_text\": \"As long as an arbitration agreement exists, the court must dismiss the lawsuit ex officio\"}, {\"option_label\": \"B\", \"option_text\": \"Company B did not raise an objection before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the court should continue to hear the case\"}, {\"option_label\": \"C\", \"option_text\": \"The court should transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for hearing\"}, {\"option_label\": \"D\", \"option_text\": \"After Company A filed the lawsuit, the arbitration agreement is naturally invalid, and the court should directly make a substantive judgment\"}], \"answer_text\": \"B. Company B did not raise an objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\", \"explanation_text\": \"The parties agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission, the arbitration institution can be determined, and the existing facts show that the arbitration agreement is valid. After Company A sued, if Company B wished to exclude court jurisdiction based on the arbitration agreement, it should have raised an objection before the first hearing of the People's Court. Company B made only substantive defenses and raised the arbitration agreement defense only at the first hearing, which exceeded the time for raising an objection. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution ex officio.\"}","[\"Company A and Company B agreed in the sales contract to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration\", \"Company A filed a lawsuit regarding the payment dispute with a People's Court having jurisdictional connection\", \"After receiving the litigation materials, Company B made only substantive defenses\", \"Company B did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court\", \"Company B raised the request to transfer to arbitration only at the first hearing\"]","[{\"fact_basis\": \"The contract agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration, and the name of the arbitration institution can be determined.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A valid arbitration agreement in principle excludes the People's Court's litigation jurisdiction over the same dispute, but the statutory objection procedure should apply.\", \"rule_application\": \"The arbitration institution agreed in this case is clear, and the facts do not show any ground for invalidity of the arbitration agreement, so it should be regarded as a valid arbitration agreement.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"The case has the premise for applying the jurisdictional rules of an arbitration agreement.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"Company B made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment in its answer and did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing.\", \"legal_rule\": \"The defendant should raise an arbitration agreement objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing of the People's Court.\", \"rule_application\": \"Company B had already participated in the substantive dispute but did not assert the arbitration agreement within the statutory time, indicating that it did not timely request the court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"Company B raised the arbitration agreement defense after the time limit.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"Company B requested transfer of the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission only at the first hearing.\", \"legal_rule\": \"If no objection is raised before the first hearing, it is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\", \"rule_application\": \"Company B's request at the first hearing was later than the statutory objection period, and it could no longer require the court to transfer the case based on the arbitration agreement.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"The People's Court should continue to hear Company A's claims rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution.\"}]","Option B is correct. Although a valid arbitration agreement existed in the contract, Company B did not raise a jurisdictional objection before the first hearing, but raised it only at the first hearing. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the Haidian District People's Court should continue to hear the case.","[\"Whether the arbitration agreement is valid and whether the arbitration institution can be determined\", \"The statutory time for the defendant to raise an arbitration agreement objection, that is, before the first hearing\", \"The procedural effect of failing to raise an objection within the time limit on the court's litigation jurisdiction and the validity of the arbitration agreement\", \"Whether the People's Court has the power to transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio\"]","[\"If Company B had raised a valid arbitration agreement before the first hearing and objected to the court's acceptance on that basis, the People's Court would generally dismiss the lawsuit according to law, except where the arbitration agreement is invalid, among other circumstances.\", \"If the arbitration agreement does not specify arbitration matters or does not specify a clear arbitration institution, it may not exclude the People's Court's jurisdiction because it lacks the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement.\", \"If the defendant did not participate in substantive defense and timely raised an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing, it cannot be deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement merely because the plaintiff has already filed a lawsuit.\"]",{"id":671,"relate_table":655,"relate_id":672,"file_size":572,"file_name":673,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":658,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":674,"cate_name":660,"legal_rules":675,"legal_domain":676,"question_type":677,"source_record":678,"facts_elements":679,"reasoning_chain":680,"answer_conclusion":681,"procedural_issues":682,"boundary_conditions":683},15110,1921243753,"样例_2.json","{\"legal_rules\": \"[{\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"A minor over 8 years old has limited civil capacity; the performance of civil juristic acts shall be represented by their legal representative or consented to or ratified by their legal representative; however, they may independently perform civil juristic acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 19 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"The actor must be a minor over 8 years old; except for acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence, other civil juristic acts require representation, consent, or ratification by the legal representative.\\\"}, {\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"Other civil juristic acts performed by a person with limited civil capacity are valid after consent or ratification by their legal representative; the counterparty may urge the legal representative to ratify within 30 days, and if the legal representative does not indicate, it is deemed a refusal to ratify.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 145 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"The act is a civil juristic act that a person with limited civil capacity cannot independently perform, and consent or ratification by the legal representative has not yet been obtained.\\\"}]\", \"legal_domain\": \"Civil Law (Civil Capacity and Contract Validity)\", \"question_type\": \"Application of Substantive Law\", \"source_record\": \"{\\\"case_text\\\": \\\"A is 10 years old and has limited civil capacity. Without parents' consent, A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan from an electronics store and used the New Year's money A usually received to pay the price. The store staff knew A's age and knew that A's parents were not present. After A returned home, A's parents refused to ratify the transaction and demanded that the store refund the price and take back the phone.\\\", \\\"question_text\\\": \\\"How should the validity of the mobile phone sales contract between A and the store be determined?\\\", \\\"options\\\": [{\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"A\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The contract is naturally valid because A used A's own New Year's money\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"B\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The contract is naturally void because civil juristic acts performed by minors are all void\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"C\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The contract is a civil juristic act with pending validity and must be ratified by A's legal representative\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"D\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The contract is naturally valid because purchasing a mobile phone is an act of daily life\\\"}], \\\"answer_text\\\": \\\"C. The sales contract is a civil juristic act with pending validity before ratification by A's legal representative.\\\", \\\"explanation_text\\\": \\\"A is over 8 but under 18 years old and has limited civil capacity. Purchasing a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan is not an act of pure benefit; considering A's age and ordinary living needs, it also cannot be recognized as a civil juristic act appropriate to A's age and intelligence. Therefore, A cannot independently perform the sales act, and the contract must be ratified by A's legal representative. If the parents clearly refuse to ratify, the contract cannot be naturally valid merely because A has paid the price.\\\"}\", \"facts_elements\": \"[\\\"A is over 10 but under 18 years old\\\", \\\"A has limited civil capacity\\\", \\\"A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan and assumed the obligation to pay the price\\\", \\\"The purchase was not a civil juristic act of pure benefit\\\", \\\"The store staff knew A's age and knew that A's parents were not present\\\", \\\"A's parents clearly refused to ratify afterward\\\"]\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"[{\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"A is 10 years old and was under 18 when purchasing the mobile phone.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A minor over 8 years old has limited civil capacity.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"A has some civil capacity but cannot independently perform all civil juristic acts.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"A had limited civil capacity when performing the mobile phone sales act.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan and assumed the obligation to pay the price.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A person with limited civil capacity may independently perform only civil juristic acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"The sales act imposed on A a relatively high price payment obligation. The price and transaction content generally exceed the daily and reasonable consumption scope of a 10-year-old minor and are not acts of pure benefit or appropriate to A's age and intelligence.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"A could not independently complete the mobile phone sales contract based solely on A's own intent.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"A's parents clearly refused to ratify, and the store previously knew A's age and that A's parents were not present.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A civil juristic act that a person with limited civil capacity cannot independently perform is valid only after consent or ratification by the legal representative.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"The parents clearly refused to ratify and there was no prior consent, so the contract did not have the legal representative's expression of intent. A's use of New Year's money to pay the price does not change A's civil capacity status.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"Without ratification, the contract cannot have full valid contractual effect on A, and the store should handle return and restitution in accordance with law.\\\"}]\", \"answer_conclusion\": \"Option C is correct. A has limited civil capacity. Purchasing a 6,000 yuan high-end mobile phone is not an act of pure benefit or an act appropriate to A's age and intelligence. The contract has pending validity before ratification by A's legal representative; after A's parents clearly refuse to ratify, the contract cannot continue to be a valid sales contract against A.\", \"procedural_issues\": \"[\\\"Whether the legal representative consented to or ratified the transaction of the person with limited civil capacity\\\", \\\"Whether the counterparty sent a demand to the legal representative and how the 30-day ratification period is calculated\\\", \\\"Return of the price and mobile phone and allocation of liability after the contract is not ratified\\\"]\", \"boundary_conditions\": \"[\\\"If the purchased item is lower-priced school supplies appropriate to the minor's age and daily living needs, it can generally be recognized as a civil juristic act that A can independently perform.\\\", \\\"If the legal representative clearly consented before the transaction or clearly ratified it afterward, the contract may have corresponding legal effect.\\\", \\\"If the actor is under 8 years old, they are in principle a person with no civil capacity, and their civil juristic acts should be performed by their legal representative, except for acts of pure benefit.\\\"]\"}","[{\"rule_text\": \"A minor over 8 years old has limited civil capacity; the performance of civil juristic acts shall be represented by their legal representative or consented to or ratified by their legal representative; however, they may independently perform civil juristic acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 19 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China\", \"application_condition\": \"The actor must be a minor over 8 years old; except for acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence, other civil juristic acts require representation, consent, or ratification by the legal representative.\"}, {\"rule_text\": \"Other civil juristic acts performed by a person with limited civil capacity are valid after consent or ratification by their legal representative; the counterparty may urge the legal representative to ratify within 30 days, and if the legal representative does not indicate, it is deemed a refusal to ratify.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 145 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China\", \"application_condition\": \"The act is a civil juristic act that a person with limited civil capacity cannot independently perform, and consent or ratification by the legal representative has not yet been obtained.\"}]","Civil Law (Civil Capacity and Contract Validity)","Application of Substantive Law","{\"case_text\": \"A is 10 years old and has limited civil capacity. Without parents' consent, A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan from an electronics store and used the New Year's money A usually received to pay the price. The store staff knew A's age and knew that A's parents were not present. After A returned home, A's parents refused to ratify the transaction and demanded that the store refund the price and take back the phone.\", \"question_text\": \"How should the validity of the mobile phone sales contract between A and the store be determined?\", \"options\": [{\"option_label\": \"A\", \"option_text\": \"The contract is naturally valid because A used A's own New Year's money\"}, {\"option_label\": \"B\", \"option_text\": \"The contract is naturally void because civil juristic acts performed by minors are all void\"}, {\"option_label\": \"C\", \"option_text\": \"The contract is a civil juristic act with pending validity and must be ratified by A's legal representative\"}, {\"option_label\": \"D\", \"option_text\": \"The contract is naturally valid because purchasing a mobile phone is an act of daily life\"}], \"answer_text\": \"C. The sales contract is a civil juristic act with pending validity before ratification by A's legal representative.\", \"explanation_text\": \"A is over 8 but under 18 years old and has limited civil capacity. Purchasing a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan is not an act of pure benefit; considering A's age and ordinary living needs, it also cannot be recognized as a civil juristic act appropriate to A's age and intelligence. Therefore, A cannot independently perform the sales act, and the contract must be ratified by A's legal representative. If the parents clearly refuse to ratify, the contract cannot be naturally valid merely because A has paid the price.\"}","[\"A is over 10 but under 18 years old\", \"A has limited civil capacity\", \"A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan and assumed the obligation to pay the price\", \"The purchase was not a civil juristic act of pure benefit\", \"The store staff knew A's age and knew that A's parents were not present\", \"A's parents clearly refused to ratify afterward\"]","[{\"fact_basis\": \"A is 10 years old and was under 18 when purchasing the mobile phone.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A minor over 8 years old has limited civil capacity.\", \"rule_application\": \"A has some civil capacity but cannot independently perform all civil juristic acts.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"A had limited civil capacity when performing the mobile phone sales act.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"A purchased a high-end mobile phone priced at 6,000 yuan and assumed the obligation to pay the price.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A person with limited civil capacity may independently perform only civil juristic acts of pure benefit or acts appropriate to their age and intelligence.\", \"rule_application\": \"The sales act imposed on A a relatively high price payment obligation. The price and transaction content generally exceed the daily and reasonable consumption scope of a 10-year-old minor and are not acts of pure benefit or appropriate to A's age and intelligence.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"A could not independently complete the mobile phone sales contract based solely on A's own intent.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"A's parents clearly refused to ratify, and the store previously knew A's age and that A's parents were not present.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A civil juristic act that a person with limited civil capacity cannot independently perform is valid only after consent or ratification by the legal representative.\", \"rule_application\": \"The parents clearly refused to ratify and there was no prior consent, so the contract did not have the legal representative's expression of intent. A's use of New Year's money to pay the price does not change A's civil capacity status.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"Without ratification, the contract cannot have full valid contractual effect on A, and the store should handle return and restitution in accordance with law.\"}]","Option C is correct. A has limited civil capacity. Purchasing a 6,000 yuan high-end mobile phone is not an act of pure benefit or an act appropriate to A's age and intelligence. The contract has pending validity before ratification by A's legal representative; after A's parents clearly refuse to ratify, the contract cannot continue to be a valid sales contract against A.","[\"Whether the legal representative consented to or ratified the transaction of the person with limited civil capacity\", \"Whether the counterparty sent a demand to the legal representative and how the 30-day ratification period is calculated\", \"Return of the price and mobile phone and allocation of liability after the contract is not ratified\"]","[\"If the purchased item is lower-priced school supplies appropriate to the minor's age and daily living needs, it can generally be recognized as a civil juristic act that A can independently perform.\", \"If the legal representative clearly consented before the transaction or clearly ratified it afterward, the contract may have corresponding legal effect.\", \"If the actor is under 8 years old, they are in principle a person with no civil capacity, and their civil juristic acts should be performed by their legal representative, except for acts of pure benefit.\"]",{"id":685,"relate_table":655,"relate_id":686,"file_size":572,"file_name":687,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":658,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":688,"cate_name":660,"legal_rules":689,"legal_domain":690,"question_type":677,"source_record":691,"facts_elements":692,"reasoning_chain":693,"answer_conclusion":694,"procedural_issues":695,"boundary_conditions":696},15109,589911060,"样例_1.json","{\"legal_rules\": \"[{\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"An act taken to stop an ongoing unlawful infringement in order to protect the state, the public interest, or the person, property, or other rights of oneself or another from that infringement, and which causes harm to the infringer, constitutes justifiable defense; if it does not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm, the person is not criminally liable.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 20, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"There must be a real, ongoing unlawful infringement; the defensive act must target the infringer and be aimed at stopping the infringement; the act must not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm.\\\"}, {\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"Taking defensive action against an ongoing violent crime such as assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnapping, or other violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, and causing injury or death to the infringer, does not constitute excessive defense.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 20, Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"The unlawful infringement must be a violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, and the defensive act must occur while the infringement is ongoing.\\\"}]\", \"legal_domain\": \"Criminal Law (Justifiable Defense)\", \"question_type\": \"Application of Substantive Law\", \"source_record\": \"{\\\"case_text\\\": \\\"A encountered B while returning home at night. B, holding a fruit knife, blocked A and demanded property. A refused and retreated to a wall. B swung the knife at A. To escape the ongoing infringement, A pushed B away with both hands; B lost balance, fell, and suffered minor injuries. A immediately called the police and remained at the scene awaiting handling.\\\", \\\"question_text\\\": \\\"Does A's act of pushing B away and causing B minor injuries constitute justifiable defense?\\\", \\\"options\\\": [{\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"A\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"A's act caused B injury and constitutes the crime of intentional injury\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"B\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"A took defensive action against an ongoing unlawful infringement; it constitutes justifiable defense\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"C\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"A's act clearly exceeded the necessary limit and constitutes excessive defense\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"D\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"A's act constitutes necessity, not justifiable defense\\\"}], \\\"answer_text\\\": \\\"B. A's act constitutes justifiable defense.\\\", \\\"explanation_text\\\": \\\"B, holding a knife, blocked A and swung the knife at A; this constituted an ongoing and real unlawful infringement and directly endangered A's personal safety. A pushed B away after retreating to the wall in order to stop the infringement and escape danger. The act had a close temporal connection with, and was targeted at, the infringement. The existing facts do not show that A clearly exceeded the limit necessary to stop the infringement, so it does not constitute excessive defense. The nature of the act is justifiable defense, not necessity.\\\"}\", \"facts_elements\": \"[\\\"B, holding a knife, blocked A and demanded property\\\", \\\"B had swung the knife at A; the unlawful infringement was ongoing\\\", \\\"A retreated to the wall and then pushed B away to escape the infringement\\\", \\\"B lost balance, fell, and suffered minor injuries\\\", \\\"After the infringement, A immediately called the police and did not continue to attack B\\\"]\", \"reasoning_chain\": \"[{\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"B, holding a fruit knife, blocked A and swung the knife at A; A had retreated to the wall.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"Justifiable defense requires a real, ongoing unlawful infringement.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"B's knife attack had already begun and directly threatened A's personal safety; it was not a danger that had not yet occurred or had already ended.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"The case satisfies the real infringement and timing conditions required for justifiable defense.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"A pushed B away only to escape B's knife attack, and B consequently fell and suffered minor injuries.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A defensive act must be aimed at stopping the infringement and must not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"Pushing away B, who was swinging a knife in attack, was necessary to stop and escape the infringement; the result of minor injuries is insufficient to prove that A clearly exceeded the necessary limit.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"A's act did not reach the level of excessive defense.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"After B fell to the ground, A did not continue to attack and immediately called the police.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A defensive act should be carried out within the scope necessary to stop the unlawful infringement.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"A did not add further attacks after the infringement stopped, showing that the purpose of A's act was to stop the infringement rather than retaliate or continue harming B.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"Overall, A's act meets the purpose and limit requirements of justifiable defense.\\\"}]\", \"answer_conclusion\": \"Option B is correct. B's knife attack was an ongoing violent infringement that seriously endangered personal safety. A pushed B away to stop the infringement and did not clearly exceed the necessary limit. A is not criminally liable.\", \"procedural_issues\": \"[]\", \"boundary_conditions\": \"[\\\"If B had already stopped attacking, fled the scene, or the infringement had ended, and A then chased and harmed B, it would generally not be recognized as justifiable defense.\\\", \\\"If A continued kicking and beating B after B fell and lost the ability to attack, it could constitute excessive defense or another crime because it exceeded the limit necessary to stop the infringement.\\\", \\\"If A actively provoked and deliberately created the conflict before the infringement occurred, it is still necessary to determine based on the specific facts whether A had the intent of justifiable defense; the mere existence of a prior dispute does not automatically negate justifiable defense.\\\"]\"}","[{\"rule_text\": \"An act taken to stop an ongoing unlawful infringement in order to protect the state, the public interest, or the person, property, or other rights of oneself or another from that infringement, and which causes harm to the infringer, constitutes justifiable defense; if it does not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm, the person is not criminally liable.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 20, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China\", \"application_condition\": \"There must be a real, ongoing unlawful infringement; the defensive act must target the infringer and be aimed at stopping the infringement; the act must not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm.\"}, {\"rule_text\": \"Taking defensive action against an ongoing violent crime such as assault, murder, robbery, rape, kidnapping, or other violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, and causing injury or death to the infringer, does not constitute excessive defense.\", \"legal_basis\": \"Article 20, Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China\", \"application_condition\": \"The unlawful infringement must be a violent crime that seriously endangers personal safety, and the defensive act must occur while the infringement is ongoing.\"}]","Criminal Law (Justifiable Defense)","{\"case_text\": \"A encountered B while returning home at night. B, holding a fruit knife, blocked A and demanded property. A refused and retreated to a wall. B swung the knife at A. To escape the ongoing infringement, A pushed B away with both hands; B lost balance, fell, and suffered minor injuries. A immediately called the police and remained at the scene awaiting handling.\", \"question_text\": \"Does A's act of pushing B away and causing B minor injuries constitute justifiable defense?\", \"options\": [{\"option_label\": \"A\", \"option_text\": \"A's act caused B injury and constitutes the crime of intentional injury\"}, {\"option_label\": \"B\", \"option_text\": \"A took defensive action against an ongoing unlawful infringement; it constitutes justifiable defense\"}, {\"option_label\": \"C\", \"option_text\": \"A's act clearly exceeded the necessary limit and constitutes excessive defense\"}, {\"option_label\": \"D\", \"option_text\": \"A's act constitutes necessity, not justifiable defense\"}], \"answer_text\": \"B. A's act constitutes justifiable defense.\", \"explanation_text\": \"B, holding a knife, blocked A and swung the knife at A; this constituted an ongoing and real unlawful infringement and directly endangered A's personal safety. A pushed B away after retreating to the wall in order to stop the infringement and escape danger. The act had a close temporal connection with, and was targeted at, the infringement. The existing facts do not show that A clearly exceeded the limit necessary to stop the infringement, so it does not constitute excessive defense. The nature of the act is justifiable defense, not necessity.\"}","[\"B, holding a knife, blocked A and demanded property\", \"B had swung the knife at A; the unlawful infringement was ongoing\", \"A retreated to the wall and then pushed B away to escape the infringement\", \"B lost balance, fell, and suffered minor injuries\", \"After the infringement, A immediately called the police and did not continue to attack B\"]","[{\"fact_basis\": \"B, holding a fruit knife, blocked A and swung the knife at A; A had retreated to the wall.\", \"legal_rule\": \"Justifiable defense requires a real, ongoing unlawful infringement.\", \"rule_application\": \"B's knife attack had already begun and directly threatened A's personal safety; it was not a danger that had not yet occurred or had already ended.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"The case satisfies the real infringement and timing conditions required for justifiable defense.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"A pushed B away only to escape B's knife attack, and B consequently fell and suffered minor injuries.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A defensive act must be aimed at stopping the infringement and must not clearly exceed the necessary limit and cause major harm.\", \"rule_application\": \"Pushing away B, who was swinging a knife in attack, was necessary to stop and escape the infringement; the result of minor injuries is insufficient to prove that A clearly exceeded the necessary limit.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"A's act did not reach the level of excessive defense.\"}, {\"fact_basis\": \"After B fell to the ground, A did not continue to attack and immediately called the police.\", \"legal_rule\": \"A defensive act should be carried out within the scope necessary to stop the unlawful infringement.\", \"rule_application\": \"A did not add further attacks after the infringement stopped, showing that the purpose of A's act was to stop the infringement rather than retaliate or continue harming B.\", \"step_conclusion\": \"Overall, A's act meets the purpose and limit requirements of justifiable defense.\"}]","Option B is correct. B's knife attack was an ongoing violent infringement that seriously endangered personal safety. A pushed B away to stop the infringement and did not clearly exceed the necessary limit. A is not criminally liable.","[]","[\"If B had already stopped attacking, fled the scene, or the infringement had ended, and A then chased and harmed B, it would generally not be recognized as justifiable defense.\", \"If A continued kicking and beating B after B fell and lost the ability to attack, it could constitute excessive defense or another crime because it exceeded the limit necessary to stop the infringement.\", \"If A actively provoked and deliberately created the conflict before the infringement occurred, it is still necessary to determine based on the specific facts whether A had the intent of justifiable defense; the mere existence of a prior dispute does not automatically negate justifiable defense.\"]","{\"legal_rules\":\"[{\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"If the parties have reached an arbitration agreement, and one party files a lawsuit with a People's Court without stating the existence of the arbitration agreement, after the People's Court accepts the case, if the other party submits the arbitration agreement before the first hearing, the People's Court shall dismiss the lawsuit; if the other party does not raise an objection to the People's Court's acceptance before the first hearing, it is deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court shall continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"A valid arbitration agreement exists; the defendant must raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court in order to request the People's Court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\\\"}, {\\\"rule_text\\\": \\\"A People's Court will not, merely because an arbitration agreement exists, transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio; whether litigation jurisdiction is excluded depends on whether a party timely raises an objection according to law and whether the arbitration agreement is valid.\\\", \\\"legal_basis\\\": \\\"Article 26 of the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China and the jurisdictional rules for arbitration agreements\\\", \\\"application_condition\\\": \\\"Only when the arbitration agreement is valid and the defendant raises an objection within the statutory time will the court review according to law and handle accordingly; if no objection is raised within the time limit, the procedural consequence of waiving the arbitration agreement arises.\\\"}]\",\"legal_domain\":\"Civil Procedure Law and Arbitration Law\",\"question_type\":\"Procedural Law Determination\",\"source_record\":\"{\\\"case_text\\\": \\\"Company A and Company B signed a sales contract for goods, agreeing to submit disputes arising from the contract to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration. Later, Company A filed a lawsuit regarding a payment dispute with the Haidian District People's Court of Beijing. After receiving the complaint materials, Company B in its answer made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment, and did not raise an arbitration agreement defense before the first hearing. Only at the first hearing did Company B raise that the parties had an arbitration agreement and request the court to transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission.\\\", \\\"question_text\\\": \\\"How should the Haidian District People's Court handle the lawsuit filed by Company A?\\\", \\\"options\\\": [{\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"A\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"As long as an arbitration agreement exists, the court must dismiss the lawsuit ex officio\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"B\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"Company B did not raise an objection before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the court should continue to hear the case\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"C\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"The court should transfer the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for hearing\\\"}, {\\\"option_label\\\": \\\"D\\\", \\\"option_text\\\": \\\"After Company A filed the lawsuit, the arbitration agreement is naturally invalid, and the court should directly make a substantive judgment\\\"}], \\\"answer_text\\\": \\\"B. Company B did not raise an objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing, which is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"explanation_text\\\": \\\"The parties agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission, the arbitration institution can be determined, and the existing facts show that the arbitration agreement is valid. After Company A sued, if Company B wished to exclude court jurisdiction based on the arbitration agreement, it should have raised an objection before the first hearing of the People's Court. Company B made only substantive defenses and raised the arbitration agreement defense only at the first hearing, which exceeded the time for raising an objection. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution ex officio.\\\"}\",\"facts_elements\":\"[\\\"Company A and Company B agreed in the sales contract to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration\\\", \\\"Company A filed a lawsuit regarding the payment dispute with a People's Court having jurisdictional connection\\\", \\\"After receiving the litigation materials, Company B made only substantive defenses\\\", \\\"Company B did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing of the People's Court\\\", \\\"Company B raised the request to transfer to arbitration only at the first hearing\\\"]\",\"reasoning_chain\":\"[{\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"The contract agreed to submit disputes to the Beijing Arbitration Commission for arbitration, and the name of the arbitration institution can be determined.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"A valid arbitration agreement in principle excludes the People's Court's litigation jurisdiction over the same dispute, but the statutory objection procedure should apply.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"The arbitration institution agreed in this case is clear, and the facts do not show any ground for invalidity of the arbitration agreement, so it should be regarded as a valid arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"The case has the premise for applying the jurisdictional rules of an arbitration agreement.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"Company B made only substantive defenses regarding goods quality and the amount of payment in its answer and did not raise an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"The defendant should raise an arbitration agreement objection to the court's acceptance before the first hearing of the People's Court.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"Company B had already participated in the substantive dispute but did not assert the arbitration agreement within the statutory time, indicating that it did not timely request the court to exclude litigation jurisdiction.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"Company B raised the arbitration agreement defense after the time limit.\\\"}, {\\\"fact_basis\\\": \\\"Company B requested transfer of the case to the Beijing Arbitration Commission only at the first hearing.\\\", \\\"legal_rule\\\": \\\"If no objection is raised before the first hearing, it is deemed a waiver of the arbitration agreement, and the People's Court should continue to hear the case.\\\", \\\"rule_application\\\": \\\"Company B's request at the first hearing was later than the statutory objection period, and it could no longer require the court to transfer the case based on the arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"step_conclusion\\\": \\\"The People's Court should continue to hear Company A's claims rather than transfer the case to the arbitration institution.\\\"}]\",\"answer_conclusion\":\"Option B is correct. Although a valid arbitration agreement existed in the contract, Company B did not raise a jurisdictional objection before the first hearing, but raised it only at the first hearing. It is deemed by law to have waived the arbitration agreement, and the Haidian District People's Court should continue to hear the case.\",\"procedural_issues\":\"[\\\"Whether the arbitration agreement is valid and whether the arbitration institution can be determined\\\", \\\"The statutory time for the defendant to raise an arbitration agreement objection, that is, before the first hearing\\\", \\\"The procedural effect of failing to raise an objection within the time limit on the court's litigation jurisdiction and the validity of the arbitration agreement\\\", \\\"Whether the People's Court has the power to transfer the case to an arbitration institution ex officio\\\"]\",\"boundary_conditions\":\"[\\\"If Company B had raised a valid arbitration agreement before the first hearing and objected to the court's acceptance on that basis, the People's Court would generally dismiss the lawsuit according to law, except where the arbitration agreement is invalid, among other circumstances.\\\", \\\"If the arbitration agreement does not specify arbitration matters or does not specify a clear arbitration institution, it may not exclude the People's Court's jurisdiction because it lacks the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement.\\\", \\\"If the defendant did not participate in substantive defense and timely raised an arbitration agreement objection before the first hearing, it cannot be deemed to have waived the arbitration agreement merely because the plaintiff has already filed a lawsuit.\\\"]\"}","MOBIUSI INC","https:\u002F\u002Fstatic.mobiusi.com\u002Fmobiwusi\u002F20250829\u002F7bf4ac62b4533e2b809998a6f1c5491e.png?Expires=1792463130&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tH8MQqhgeiAtrzCHrxM&Signature=v6Tr8jBrdm4s5wU1SnnyGsYg%2Bhw%3D&x-oss-process=image%2Fresize%2Cm_fill%2Cw_35%2Ch_35",[701,707],{"type":702,"title":703,"count_data":704},"bar","Length distribution",[705],{"name":706,"value":483},"1k lower",{"type":708,"title":709,"count_data":710},"pie","Language distribution",[711],{"name":712,"value":483},"English"]