[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$apiParty6fBuHLCPZ1LTYs42XHdVbjpSDOYYPYzyxeAGwSN5Tp8":3,"$apiPartykfsnsPuWrM0iyc1_ADktxaI0GcLv0_9wsA4aqQ2FLLM":563,"$apiPartykfsnsPuWrM0iyc1_ADktxaI0GcLv0_9wsA4aqQ2FLLM$H93EERW16b":563},{"product_data":4,"scene_data":21,"task_data":407,"modality_data":441,"domain_data":478},[5,9,12,15,18],{"name":6,"value":7,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Rivo","1","",{"name":10,"value":11,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Cubo","2",{"name":13,"value":14,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Moye","3",{"name":16,"value":17,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Juro","4",{"name":19,"value":20,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Ordo","5",[22,73,135,197,232,267,302,337,372],{"name":23,"value":7,"add_value":24,"describe":25,"children":26},"Home & Indoor","sofa","AI enhances everyday home life. Our datasets cover real indoor scenes to support smart devices, robotics, and home intelligence.",[27,29,31,33,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":28,"value":7},"Living Room",{"name":30,"value":11},"Bedroom",{"name":32,"value":14},"Kitchen",{"name":34,"value":17},"Dining Area",{"name":36,"value":20},"Bathroom",{"name":38,"value":39},"Entrance \u002F Foyer","6",{"name":41,"value":42},"Corridor \u002F Hallway","7",{"name":44,"value":45},"Staircase","8",{"name":47,"value":48},"Home Office","9",{"name":50,"value":51},"Hobby \u002F Game Room","10",{"name":53,"value":54},"Worship Space","11",{"name":56,"value":57},"Garage","12",{"name":59,"value":60},"Utility \u002F Laundry Room","13",{"name":62,"value":63},"Pantry","14",{"name":65,"value":66},"Basement","15",{"name":68,"value":69},"Garden","16",{"name":71,"value":72},"Balcony","17",{"name":74,"value":11,"add_value":75,"describe":76,"children":77},"Office & Educational","workshop","AI is reshaping work and learning. Our datasets capture offices and classrooms to power automation and next-generation productivity tools.",[78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99,102,105,108,111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132],{"name":79,"value":80},"Open Office","18",{"name":82,"value":83},"Private Office","19",{"name":85,"value":86},"Co-working Space","20",{"name":88,"value":89},"Reception \u002F Lobby","21",{"name":91,"value":92},"Conference Room","22",{"name":94,"value":95},"Huddle Room \u002F Booth","23",{"name":97,"value":98},"Lecture Hall \u002F Auditorium","24",{"name":100,"value":101},"Classroom","25",{"name":103,"value":104},"Science Laboratory","26",{"name":106,"value":107},"Library","27",{"name":109,"value":110},"Design Studio","28",{"name":112,"value":113},"Pantry \u002F Breakroom","29",{"name":115,"value":116},"Cafeteria \u002F Canteen","30",{"name":118,"value":119},"Restroom (Commercial)","31",{"name":121,"value":122},"Gymnasium \u002F Sports Hall","32",{"name":124,"value":125},"Server Room","33",{"name":127,"value":128},"Mailroom \u002F Logistics","34",{"name":130,"value":131},"Janitorial Closet","35",{"name":133,"value":134},"Corridor \u002F Elevators","36",{"name":136,"value":14,"add_value":137,"describe":138,"children":139},"Healthcare & Medical","love-and-help","AI is advancing modern healthcare. Our datasets include clinics and hospitals to enable clinical insights and medical automation.",[140,143,146,149,152,155,158,161,164,167,170,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194],{"name":141,"value":142},"Operating Theatre \u002F OR","37",{"name":144,"value":145},"Consultation Room","38",{"name":147,"value":148},"Treatment Room","39",{"name":150,"value":151},"Dental Clinic","40",{"name":153,"value":154},"Inpatient Ward","41",{"name":156,"value":157},"Nurse Station","42",{"name":159,"value":160},"ICU","43",{"name":162,"value":163},"NICU (Neonatal ICU)","44",{"name":165,"value":166},"Emergency Room (ER)","45",{"name":168,"value":169},"Hospital Corridor","46",{"name":171,"value":172},"Waiting Area","47",{"name":174,"value":175},"CT\u002FMRI","48",{"name":177,"value":178},"Medical Laboratory","49",{"name":180,"value":181},"Phlebotomy Room","50",{"name":183,"value":184},"Rehabilitation Gym","51",{"name":186,"value":187},"Assisted Living Room","52",{"name":189,"value":190},"Pharmacy","53",{"name":192,"value":193},"Sterile Processing Dept","54",{"name":195,"value":196},"Medical Storage","55",{"name":198,"value":17,"add_value":199,"describe":200,"children":201},"Business & Public Service","business","AI is elevating commercial and public services. Our datasets span retail, dining, and service centers to improve intelligent operations.",[202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229],{"name":203,"value":204},"Shopping Mall Atrium","86",{"name":206,"value":207},"Supermarket Shelf","87",{"name":209,"value":210},"Self-Checkout Counter","88",{"name":212,"value":213},"Restaurant Dining Hall","89",{"name":215,"value":216},"Commercial Kitchen","90",{"name":218,"value":219},"Hotel Lobby","91",{"name":221,"value":222},"Subway Platform","92",{"name":224,"value":225},"Security Checkpoint","93",{"name":227,"value":228},"Underground Parking","94",{"name":230,"value":231},"Bank Teller Zone","95",{"name":233,"value":20,"add_value":234,"describe":235,"children":236},"Industrial & Manufacturing","robot-arm","AI is modernizing industry. Our datasets capture factories and logistics spaces to support robotics and intelligent manufacturing.",[237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264],{"name":238,"value":239},"Final Assembly Line","96",{"name":241,"value":242},"Quality Control Station","97",{"name":244,"value":245},"Robotic Welding Cell","98",{"name":247,"value":248},"CNC Machining Center","99",{"name":250,"value":251},"Cleanroom","100",{"name":253,"value":254},"Automated Warehouse","101",{"name":256,"value":257},"Loading Dock","102",{"name":259,"value":260},"Sorting Center","103",{"name":262,"value":263},"Chemical Plant","104",{"name":265,"value":266},"Power Substation","105",{"name":268,"value":39,"add_value":269,"describe":270,"children":271},"Transportation & Driving","car","AI is revolutionizing mobility. Our datasets capture road networks, vehicle dynamics and traffic scenarios to support autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems.",[272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299],{"name":273,"value":274},"Urban Intersection","56",{"name":276,"value":277},"Highway \u002F Expressway","57",{"name":279,"value":280},"Tunnel","58",{"name":282,"value":283},"Roundabout","59",{"name":285,"value":286},"School \u002F Hospital Zone","60",{"name":288,"value":289},"Toll Station","61",{"name":291,"value":292},"Construction Zone","62",{"name":294,"value":295},"Parking Garage","63",{"name":297,"value":298},"Driver Cabin","64",{"name":300,"value":301},"Adverse Weather","65",{"name":303,"value":42,"add_value":304,"describe":305,"children":306},"Outdoor & Construction","tent-tree","AI is optimizing outdoor operations. Our datasets capture construction sites, open-air work zones and outdoor infrastructure to support smart construction and autonomous outdoor machinery.",[307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334],{"name":308,"value":309},"Excavation Site","66",{"name":311,"value":312},"Scaffolding Area","67",{"name":314,"value":315},"Material Storage Yard","68",{"name":317,"value":318},"Site Entrance","69",{"name":320,"value":321},"Roadwork Zone","70",{"name":323,"value":324},"Bridge Infrastructure","71",{"name":326,"value":327},"Transmission Line","72",{"name":329,"value":330},"Open-pit Mine","73",{"name":332,"value":333},"Tunneling Site","74",{"name":335,"value":336},"Post-Disaster Rubble","75",{"name":338,"value":45,"add_value":339,"describe":340,"children":341},"Nature, Aerial & Aquatic","global-loop","AI is exploring the natural world. Our datasets capture terrestrial landscapes, aerial vistas and aquatic ecosystems to support environmental monitoring and autonomous exploration systems.",[342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369],{"name":343,"value":344},"Deep Forest","76",{"name":346,"value":347},"Farmland \u002F Crops","77",{"name":349,"value":350},"River \u002F Lake","78",{"name":352,"value":353},"Open Ocean","79",{"name":355,"value":356},"Underwater Coral Reef","80",{"name":358,"value":359},"Fish Farm","81",{"name":361,"value":362},"Mountain Terrain","82",{"name":364,"value":365},"Urban Low Altitude","83",{"name":367,"value":368},"Fire Scene","84",{"name":370,"value":371},"Desert \u002F Gobi","85",{"name":373,"value":48,"add_value":374,"describe":375,"children":376},"Virtul & Digital","siri","AI is reshaping the virtual realm. Our datasets capture digital twins, virtual environments and simulated spaces to support metaverse development and intelligent digital interaction.",[377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404],{"name":378,"value":379},"VR Social Space","106",{"name":381,"value":382},"Synthetic Driving Sim","107",{"name":384,"value":385},"Digital Twin City","108",{"name":387,"value":388},"FPS \u002F MOBA Game","109",{"name":390,"value":391},"Robotics Gym","110",{"name":393,"value":394},"AR Navigation","111",{"name":396,"value":397},"Virtual Showroom","112",{"name":399,"value":400},"Code \u002F IDE Interface","113",{"name":402,"value":403},"App GUI Screen","114",{"name":405,"value":406},"Synthetic Face\u002FID","115",[408,411,414,417,420,423,426,429,432,435,438],{"name":409,"value":7,"add_value":410,"describe":8},"Classification","rubric",{"name":412,"value":11,"add_value":413,"describe":8},"Detection","radar",{"name":415,"value":14,"add_value":416,"describe":8},"Segmentation","segmentation",{"name":418,"value":17,"add_value":419,"describe":8},"Tacking","crosshairs",{"name":421,"value":20,"add_value":422,"describe":8},"Estimation","streamline",{"name":424,"value":39,"add_value":425,"describe":8},"QA","qa",{"name":427,"value":42,"add_value":428,"describe":8},"Recognition","finger-scan",{"name":430,"value":45,"add_value":431,"describe":8},"Control","control",{"name":433,"value":48,"add_value":434,"describe":8},"Extraction","extraction",{"name":436,"value":51,"add_value":437,"describe":8},"Retrieval","retrieval",{"name":439,"value":54,"add_value":440,"describe":8},"Forecast","forecast",[442,445,448,451,454,457,460,463,466,469,472,475],{"name":443,"value":7,"add_value":444,"describe":8},"Audio","audio",{"name":446,"value":11,"add_value":447,"describe":8},"Image","image",{"name":449,"value":14,"add_value":450,"describe":8},"Text","text",{"name":452,"value":17,"add_value":453,"describe":8},"Video","video",{"name":455,"value":20,"add_value":456,"describe":8},"Multi","multi",{"name":458,"value":39,"add_value":459,"describe":8},"Document","document",{"name":461,"value":42,"add_value":462,"describe":8},"Time-Series","time-series",{"name":464,"value":45,"add_value":465,"describe":8},"3D cloud","cloud",{"name":467,"value":48,"add_value":468,"describe":8},"Code","code",{"name":470,"value":51,"add_value":471,"describe":8},"Event","event",{"name":473,"value":54,"add_value":474,"describe":8},"Motion","motion",{"name":476,"value":57,"add_value":477,"describe":8},"Interaction","interaction",[479,482,487,491,494,499,504,509,514,519,524,528,532,536,540,544,548,552,556,559],{"id":480,"value":480,"name":233,"intro":481,"add_value":234,"describe":481},2,"智能质检：利用图像识别、多模态模型对产品外观或声音、振动等数据进行分析，自动识别缺陷，提高质量控制效率。\n工业知识问答与文档理解：通过大模型理解和总结技术文档、操作手册，实现快速问答、知识检索和培训支持。\n安全监测与风险预警：实时分析视频、传感器和操作日志，识别潜在危险行为或异常状态，提前预警，保障人员和设备安全。",{"id":483,"value":483,"name":484,"intro":485,"add_value":486,"describe":485},3,"Finance & Insurance","风险评估与预测：分析大量客户数据，评估信用风险、市场风险等，预测违约概率、股价走势等，辅助金融机构决策。\n智能投顾：根据客户风险偏好、资产状况等，提供个性化投资组合建议，实时调整投资策略。\n反欺诈检测：通过分析交易数据、用户行为，识别异常交易和欺诈行为，保障金融安全。","funds",{"id":488,"value":488,"name":489,"intro":490,"add_value":269,"describe":490},1,"Transport & Automotive","智能座舱：打造多模态交互的 AI 座舱，通过语音、手势、面部识别等实现人机交互，如语音控制导航、音乐播放。\n驾驶员状态监测：识别疲劳、分心、抽烟、打电话等行为，通过大模型判断危险等级，触发相应提醒或干预机制。\n智能驾驶：AI 用于环境感知、路径规划与决策控制，使车辆能识别道路、行人、障碍物等，实现自适应巡航、自动泊车、车道保持等功能，提升驾驶安全性与便利性。",{"id":492,"value":492,"name":136,"intro":493,"add_value":137,"describe":493},4,"医学影像诊断：分析 CT、MRI 等影像，辅助医生检测疾病、识别病灶，如 AI 系统可快速发现肺部结节。\n医患对话助手：通过自然语言处理理解患者问题，提供初步健康建议或就诊指导，缓解医生接诊压力。\n智能健康管理：根据用户健康数据，提供个性化健康建议、疾病预警，如智能手环结合 AI 分析用户运动、睡眠、心率等数据。",{"id":495,"value":495,"name":496,"intro":497,"add_value":498,"describe":497},6,"Smart Devices","多模态交互：支持语音、手势、眼神等多种交互方式，如 AI 眼镜可通过语音指令实现翻译、搜索功能。\n智能感知与处理：使设备能感知环境、理解用户需求，如智能音箱根据环境噪音自动调节音量。\n个性化服务：根据用户使用习惯和偏好，提供个性化功能与服务，如智能手表为用户定制运动健身计划。","microscope",{"id":500,"value":500,"name":501,"intro":502,"add_value":503,"describe":502},8,"Law & Government","智能法律问答：面向公众或企业用户，提供合规、劳动法、婚姻继承、知识产权等常见法律问题的智能解答。\n合同审查与风险识别：利用大模型分析合同内容，识别潜在风险条款、漏洞或不合理约定，提升合同审核质量。\n法律知识图谱构建：自动梳理法规、案例、条文之间的引用关系，构建语义化知识图谱，支持智能分析和推理。","hammer",{"id":505,"value":505,"name":506,"intro":507,"add_value":508,"describe":507},7,"Education & Training","个性化学习：根据学生学习进度、能力和知识掌握情况，推送个性化学习内容与练习，如智能辅导系统为学生制定专属学习计划。\n智能教学辅助：AI 助教协助教师进行作业批改、答疑解惑，还可分析教学数据，为教师提供教学反馈，优化教学方法。\n虚拟学习环境：利用 AI 创建虚拟实验、历史场景等，让学生沉浸式学习，如在虚拟化学实验室中进行实验操作。","degree-hat",{"id":510,"value":510,"name":511,"intro":512,"add_value":513,"describe":512},5,"Agriculture & Food","作物病虫害识别与防治：通过图像识别分析农作物叶片、果实等症状，识别病虫害类型，给出防治建议，减少产量损失。\n农产品质量检测：利用图像和传感器数据，识别果蔬等农产品的成熟度、外观缺陷，进行自动分级，提高市场竞争力。\n农情监测与预测：利用卫星遥感、气象和传感器数据，结合大模型预测作物长势、干旱、洪涝等农情变化。","ph-farm",{"id":515,"value":515,"name":516,"intro":517,"add_value":518,"describe":517},9,"Retail & E-commerce","智能客服：通过自然语言对话理解用户需求，提供产品推荐、订单查询、退换货支持等服务，提升客户满意度。\n个性化营销推荐：基于用户浏览、购买、偏好等行为数据，生成个性化推荐内容与优惠策略，提高转化率和客单价。\n商品内容生成：自动撰写商品标题、卖点描述、使用说明等内容，适用于海量SKU的内容生产与多语言发布。","buy",{"id":520,"value":520,"name":521,"intro":522,"add_value":523,"describe":8},10,"Security & Protection",null,"safe-shield-line",{"id":525,"value":525,"name":526,"intro":522,"add_value":527,"describe":8},11,"Environment & Climate","weather",{"id":529,"value":529,"name":530,"intro":522,"add_value":531,"describe":8},12,"Energy & Resource","energy-leaf",{"id":533,"value":533,"name":534,"intro":522,"add_value":535,"describe":8},13,"Express & Logistics","speed-outline",{"id":537,"value":537,"name":538,"intro":522,"add_value":539,"describe":8},15,"Sports","baseball-outline",{"id":541,"value":541,"name":542,"intro":522,"add_value":543,"describe":8},16,"General Data","daily-booth",{"id":545,"value":545,"name":546,"intro":522,"add_value":547,"describe":8},17,"Content & Media","media",{"id":549,"value":549,"name":550,"intro":522,"add_value":551,"describe":8},18,"Construction","construction",{"id":553,"value":553,"name":554,"intro":522,"add_value":555,"describe":8},19,"IT & Telecom","tech",{"id":557,"value":557,"name":558,"intro":522,"add_value":498,"describe":8},20,"Science & Research",{"id":560,"value":560,"name":561,"intro":522,"add_value":562,"describe":8},21,"Language & Culture","lang",{"id":564,"unique_code":565,"title":566,"icon":8,"intro":567,"cate":483,"detail":568,"create_time":569,"update_time":570,"price":571,"view_count":572,"download_count":573,"unit":573,"amount":574,"is_create_order":573,"enterprise_id":488,"seo_keywords":575,"seo_description":576,"data_format":577,"file_size":578,"apply_scene":579,"training_task":580,"version":581,"dataset_type_id":492,"dataset_scene_id":553,"sample_file":522,"banner":8,"unit_name":8,"cate_name":449,"icon_url":8,"banner_url":8,"sample_file_url":8,"data_dict":582,"qa_list":619,"sample_metadatas":636,"text_sample_content":669,"enterprise_name":670,"enterprise_logo":671,"data_distribution":672},1082,"be1a293e32a894a7de3c74fd4af22ab4","Open RAN Interoperability Pattern Induction Q&A Dataset","Train models to infer recurring patterns from multi-vendor Open RAN interoperability cases and explain the evidence and limits of each conclusion.","\u003Cp>This question-and-answer text dataset presents multi-vendor Open RAN interoperability cases involving O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU components, including component combinations, interfaces, software configurations, and observed outcomes. Each sample asks a model to compare multiple cases, identify recurring compatibility conditions or interoperability issue patterns, and provide supporting evidence and applicability boundaries. The data supports inductive reasoning training, reasoning SFT, and evaluation of interoperability analysis capabilities in the Open RAN domain.\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-09 19:04:06","2026-10-19 17:18:43","0.00",33,0,5000,"Open RAN dataset, RAN interoperability, interoperability Q&A, inductive reasoning data, reasoning SFT, O-CU, O-DU, O-RU","Question-and-answer data for multi-vendor Open RAN interoperability cases, supporting compatibility pattern induction, evidence analysis, and boundary judgments","JSON","0.4GB","Open RAN interoperability testing, multi-vendor network integration, telecom network compatibility assessment","pattern induction, evidence-based reasoning, interoperability analysis","V1.0",[583,588,593,599,604,609,614],{"id":573,"name":584,"field":585,"intro":586,"type":587},"File Name","file_name","File name","string",{"id":589,"name":590,"field":591,"intro":592,"type":587},7861,"Induction Question","question","A question asking the model to identify recurring compatibility conditions or interoperability issue patterns across the cases and explain the evidence and applicability boundaries.",{"id":594,"name":595,"field":596,"intro":597,"type":598},7862,"Interoperability Cases","case_inputs","One or more O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU interoperability cases used for pattern induction.","array",{"id":600,"name":601,"field":602,"intro":603,"type":587},7863,"Final Answer","final_answer","A complete user-facing response that combines the inferred conclusion, supporting case evidence, and applicability boundaries.",{"id":605,"name":606,"field":607,"intro":608,"type":587},7864,"Recurring Pattern","recurring_pattern","A summary of the shared compatibility condition or interoperability issue pattern found across multiple cases.",{"id":610,"name":611,"field":612,"intro":613,"type":598},7865,"Supporting Evidence","supporting_evidence","Case identifiers and specific observations that support the inferred pattern.",{"id":615,"name":616,"field":617,"intro":618,"type":587},7866,"Applicability Boundary","applicability_boundary","The component combinations, interfaces, or software configurations to which the pattern applies, along with cases that cannot be inferred from it.",[620,624,628,632],{"id":621,"question":622,"answer":623},5776,"What does the dataset contain?","The dataset covers interoperability cases involving O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU components, including component combinations, interfaces or software configurations, and observed outcomes. Samples ask models to identify shared compatibility conditions or recurring issue patterns across multiple cases and explain the evidence and scope of each conclusion.",{"id":625,"question":626,"answer":627},5777,"How are the samples structured, and what capabilities can they train?","Samples use a question-and-answer structure with case inputs, an induction question, a recurring pattern, supporting evidence, applicability boundaries, and a final answer. They are suitable for training cross-case comparison, inductive reasoning, evidence-based responses, and boundary judgments, as well as for reasoning SFT and capability evaluation.",{"id":629,"question":630,"answer":631},5778,"How should inductive conclusions in the dataset be interpreted?","Each conclusion should be supported by the listed cases and their specific observations, and limited to the stated component combinations, interfaces, or software configurations. It should not be treated as a universal guarantee for unrepresented equipment combinations or configurations, nor as a substitute for interoperability testing.",{"id":633,"question":634,"answer":635},5779,"What are some potential use cases?","Potential uses include Open RAN interoperability question answering, case-analysis assistants, compatibility issue pattern recognition, and training or evaluating reasoning models for technical support and engineering analysis. For deployment decisions, conclusions should be verified against vendor documentation, version details, and field test results.",[637,649,659],{"id":638,"relate_table":639,"relate_id":640,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":641,"cate_name":642,"question":643,"case_inputs":644,"final_answer":645,"recurring_pattern":646,"supporting_evidence":647,"applicability_boundary":648},14648,"union_cubo",958670730,"{\"question\": \"What recurring condition for compression-profile negotiation is supported by these cases? Identify the supporting observations and the limits of the inference.\", \"case_inputs\": \"[{\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Fern-CU 7.0 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Harbor-RU 3.1 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests compression profile CP-A, which the RU advertises as supported.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Juniper-CU 2.4 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Kestrel-RU 1.8 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests CP-B, while the RU advertises CP-A only.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation is rejected, and the RU does not enter the operational state.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU versions and connection from case 2 are retained. The DU request is changed from CP-B to CP-A, which is advertised by the RU.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\\\"}]\", \"final_answer\": \"The cases support a profile-compatibility condition: the DU's requested compression profile must be one the RU advertises for negotiation to complete in the configurations described. Case 1 completes with CP-A requested and advertised. Case 2 is rejected when CP-B is requested but only CP-A is advertised; case 3 completes after the request is changed to CP-A with the components retained. The evidence is limited to these profiles and configurations and does not establish that profile agreement alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.\", \"recurring_pattern\": \"In the listed configurations, negotiation completes when the DU-requested compression profile is among the profiles advertised by the RU. The one recorded mismatch is rejected, and changing the request to the advertised CP-A is followed by successful negotiation.\", \"supporting_evidence\": \"[{\\\"case_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The DU requests CP-A, the RU advertises CP-A, and negotiation completes with the RU operational.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [2], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The DU requests CP-B while the RU advertises only CP-A; negotiation is rejected and the RU does not become operational.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [3], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"With the case 2 components retained, changing the DU request to the RU-advertised CP-A is followed by completed negotiation and an operational RU.\\\"}]\", \"applicability_boundary\": \"This inference covers only the stated profile requests, advertisements, and component combinations. The cases do not establish behavior for other compression profiles, software versions, or negotiation settings, and they do not show that matching profiles alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.\"}","文本","What recurring condition for compression-profile negotiation is supported by these cases? Identify the supporting observations and the limits of the inference.","[{\"configuration\": \"O-CU Fern-CU 7.0 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Harbor-RU 3.1 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests compression profile CP-A, which the RU advertises as supported.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"O-CU Juniper-CU 2.4 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Kestrel-RU 1.8 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests CP-B, while the RU advertises CP-A only.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"Profile negotiation is rejected, and the RU does not enter the operational state.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU versions and connection from case 2 are retained. The DU request is changed from CP-B to CP-A, which is advertised by the RU.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\"}]","The cases support a profile-compatibility condition: the DU's requested compression profile must be one the RU advertises for negotiation to complete in the configurations described. Case 1 completes with CP-A requested and advertised. Case 2 is rejected when CP-B is requested but only CP-A is advertised; case 3 completes after the request is changed to CP-A with the components retained. The evidence is limited to these profiles and configurations and does not establish that profile agreement alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.","In the listed configurations, negotiation completes when the DU-requested compression profile is among the profiles advertised by the RU. The one recorded mismatch is rejected, and changing the request to the advertised CP-A is followed by successful negotiation.","[{\"case_numbers\": [1], \"observation\": \"The DU requests CP-A, the RU advertises CP-A, and negotiation completes with the RU operational.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [2], \"observation\": \"The DU requests CP-B while the RU advertises only CP-A; negotiation is rejected and the RU does not become operational.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [3], \"observation\": \"With the case 2 components retained, changing the DU request to the RU-advertised CP-A is followed by completed negotiation and an operational RU.\"}]","This inference covers only the stated profile requests, advertisements, and component combinations. The cases do not establish behavior for other compression profiles, software versions, or negotiation settings, and they do not show that matching profiles alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.",{"id":650,"relate_table":639,"relate_id":651,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":652,"cate_name":642,"question":653,"case_inputs":654,"final_answer":655,"recurring_pattern":656,"supporting_evidence":657,"applicability_boundary":658},14647,339659300,"{\"question\": \"What recurring relationship between the Open Fronthaul path limit and the DU packet size appears in these cases? Support the inference with case numbers and explain its scope.\", \"case_inputs\": \"[{\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Alder-CU 2.6 and O-DU Bracken-DU 4.0 connect to O-RU Cinder-RU 1.9 over Open Fronthaul through a switch path configured for a 1500-byte maximum frame. The DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"The RU receives smaller packets, but larger packets are dropped on the path and radio processing does not become stable.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Drift-CU 3.1 and O-DU Bracken-DU 4.0 connect to O-RU Elm-RU 2.2 over Open Fronthaul. The path maximum frame size is configured to 9000 bytes, and the DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"The RU receives the configured packet sizes, and radio processing remains stable during the recorded interval.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU from case 1 are retained. The switch path maximum frame size is raised from 1500 to 9000 bytes; the DU packet-size setting is unchanged.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"The previously dropped larger packets reach the RU, and radio processing becomes stable during the recorded interval.\\\"}]\", \"final_answer\": \"The cases show a consistent association between the configured path maximum and the DU's packet sizes. In case 1, the path is limited to 1500 bytes while packets reach 3000 bytes, and larger packets are dropped. Case 2 records stable processing when the path limit is 9000 bytes for packets up to 3000 bytes. In case 3, raising the case 1 path limit to 9000 bytes is followed by delivery of the larger packets and stable processing. This supports a compatibility condition for the stated configurations, not a universal frame-size rule or a claim that path capacity is the only determinant of interoperability.\", \"recurring_pattern\": \"In the listed configurations, packets larger than the path's configured maximum are associated with packet drops and unstable radio processing, while a path limit above the configured packet sizes is associated with successful delivery and stable processing.\", \"supporting_evidence\": \"[{\\\"case_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes over a path limited to 1500 bytes; larger packets are dropped and radio processing does not become stable.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [2], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The path is configured for 9000-byte frames while the DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes; the RU receives those sizes and processing remains stable during the recorded interval.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [3], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"With the case 1 components and DU packet-size setting retained, raising the path limit to 9000 bytes is followed by delivery of the larger packets and stable radio processing.\\\"}]\", \"applicability_boundary\": \"The pattern applies to the stated packet sizes and path limits in these Open Fronthaul configurations. These cases do not establish a universal frame-size requirement or prove that path capacity is the only factor affecting processing stability; they provide no result for other packetization, switch, or component configurations.\"}","What recurring relationship between the Open Fronthaul path limit and the DU packet size appears in these cases? Support the inference with case numbers and explain its scope.","[{\"configuration\": \"O-CU Alder-CU 2.6 and O-DU Bracken-DU 4.0 connect to O-RU Cinder-RU 1.9 over Open Fronthaul through a switch path configured for a 1500-byte maximum frame. The DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"The RU receives smaller packets, but larger packets are dropped on the path and radio processing does not become stable.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"O-CU Drift-CU 3.1 and O-DU Bracken-DU 4.0 connect to O-RU Elm-RU 2.2 over Open Fronthaul. The path maximum frame size is configured to 9000 bytes, and the DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"The RU receives the configured packet sizes, and radio processing remains stable during the recorded interval.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU from case 1 are retained. The switch path maximum frame size is raised from 1500 to 9000 bytes; the DU packet-size setting is unchanged.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"The previously dropped larger packets reach the RU, and radio processing becomes stable during the recorded interval.\"}]","The cases show a consistent association between the configured path maximum and the DU's packet sizes. In case 1, the path is limited to 1500 bytes while packets reach 3000 bytes, and larger packets are dropped. Case 2 records stable processing when the path limit is 9000 bytes for packets up to 3000 bytes. In case 3, raising the case 1 path limit to 9000 bytes is followed by delivery of the larger packets and stable processing. This supports a compatibility condition for the stated configurations, not a universal frame-size rule or a claim that path capacity is the only determinant of interoperability.","In the listed configurations, packets larger than the path's configured maximum are associated with packet drops and unstable radio processing, while a path limit above the configured packet sizes is associated with successful delivery and stable processing.","[{\"case_numbers\": [1], \"observation\": \"The DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes over a path limited to 1500 bytes; larger packets are dropped and radio processing does not become stable.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [2], \"observation\": \"The path is configured for 9000-byte frames while the DU emits packets up to 3000 bytes; the RU receives those sizes and processing remains stable during the recorded interval.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [3], \"observation\": \"With the case 1 components and DU packet-size setting retained, raising the path limit to 9000 bytes is followed by delivery of the larger packets and stable radio processing.\"}]","The pattern applies to the stated packet sizes and path limits in these Open Fronthaul configurations. These cases do not establish a universal frame-size requirement or prove that path capacity is the only factor affecting processing stability; they provide no result for other packetization, switch, or component configurations.",{"id":660,"relate_table":639,"relate_id":661,"file_size":573,"file_name":8,"path":8,"duration":573,"cate":483,"file_format":8,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":662,"cate_name":642,"question":663,"case_inputs":664,"final_answer":665,"recurring_pattern":666,"supporting_evidence":667,"applicability_boundary":668},14646,203003254,"{\"question\": \"Across these cases, what recurring compatibility condition is associated with successful operation? Cite the case evidence and state the limits of the conclusion.\", \"case_inputs\": \"[{\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Cedarwave-CU 5.4 and O-DU Lattice-DU 3.2 are connected to O-RU Pine-RU 2.7 over Open Fronthaul. The DU expects timing profile P1, and the RU is configured to use P1.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"The RU reports stable synchronization, and the cell reaches the operational state.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Meridian-CU 6.1 and O-DU Lattice-DU 3.2 are connected to O-RU Vale-RU 2.3 over Open Fronthaul. The DU expects timing profile P2, while the RU is configured to use P1.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Synchronization does not stabilize, and the cell remains unavailable.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU versions and Open Fronthaul connection from case 2 are retained. The RU timing profile is changed from P1 to P2 to match the DU expectation.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Synchronization stabilizes, and the cell reaches the operational state.\\\"}]\", \"final_answer\": \"The cases indicate that matching the O-DU's expected timing profile to the O-RU's configured profile is associated with stable synchronization in the configurations examined. Case 1 operates with P1 matched to P1. Case 2 does not stabilize with P2 expected and P1 configured, while case 3 stabilizes after the RU is changed to P2 with the other listed settings retained. This conclusion is limited to these component combinations and configurations; it does not show that profile matching is sufficient for interoperability in all deployments.\", \"recurring_pattern\": \"In the listed configurations, stable operation is associated with the O-RU timing profile matching the O-DU's expected profile. The mismatch in case 2 coincides with unstable synchronization; changing the RU profile to match in case 3 coincides with recovery.\", \"supporting_evidence\": \"[{\\\"case_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The O-DU expects P1 and the O-RU uses P1; synchronization is stable and the cell becomes operational.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [2], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The O-DU expects P2 while the O-RU uses P1; synchronization does not stabilize and the cell remains unavailable.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [3], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"With the case 2 component versions and connection retained, changing the RU profile to P2 is followed by stable synchronization and an operational cell.\\\"}]\", \"applicability_boundary\": \"This pattern is supported only for the timing-profile configurations and component combinations described in these cases. The cases do not establish that profile alignment alone guarantees operation in other deployments, nor do they identify the cause of any failure involving different timing settings or software versions.\"}","Across these cases, what recurring compatibility condition is associated with successful operation? Cite the case evidence and state the limits of the conclusion.","[{\"configuration\": \"O-CU Cedarwave-CU 5.4 and O-DU Lattice-DU 3.2 are connected to O-RU Pine-RU 2.7 over Open Fronthaul. The DU expects timing profile P1, and the RU is configured to use P1.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"The RU reports stable synchronization, and the cell reaches the operational state.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"O-CU Meridian-CU 6.1 and O-DU Lattice-DU 3.2 are connected to O-RU Vale-RU 2.3 over Open Fronthaul. The DU expects timing profile P2, while the RU is configured to use P1.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"Synchronization does not stabilize, and the cell remains unavailable.\"}, {\"configuration\": \"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU versions and Open Fronthaul connection from case 2 are retained. The RU timing profile is changed from P1 to P2 to match the DU expectation.\", \"interoperability_result\": \"Synchronization stabilizes, and the cell reaches the operational state.\"}]","The cases indicate that matching the O-DU's expected timing profile to the O-RU's configured profile is associated with stable synchronization in the configurations examined. Case 1 operates with P1 matched to P1. Case 2 does not stabilize with P2 expected and P1 configured, while case 3 stabilizes after the RU is changed to P2 with the other listed settings retained. This conclusion is limited to these component combinations and configurations; it does not show that profile matching is sufficient for interoperability in all deployments.","In the listed configurations, stable operation is associated with the O-RU timing profile matching the O-DU's expected profile. The mismatch in case 2 coincides with unstable synchronization; changing the RU profile to match in case 3 coincides with recovery.","[{\"case_numbers\": [1], \"observation\": \"The O-DU expects P1 and the O-RU uses P1; synchronization is stable and the cell becomes operational.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [2], \"observation\": \"The O-DU expects P2 while the O-RU uses P1; synchronization does not stabilize and the cell remains unavailable.\"}, {\"case_numbers\": [3], \"observation\": \"With the case 2 component versions and connection retained, changing the RU profile to P2 is followed by stable synchronization and an operational cell.\"}]","This pattern is supported only for the timing-profile configurations and component combinations described in these cases. The cases do not establish that profile alignment alone guarantees operation in other deployments, nor do they identify the cause of any failure involving different timing settings or software versions.","{\"question\":\"What recurring condition for compression-profile negotiation is supported by these cases? Identify the supporting observations and the limits of the inference.\",\"case_inputs\":\"[{\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Fern-CU 7.0 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Harbor-RU 3.1 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests compression profile CP-A, which the RU advertises as supported.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"O-CU Juniper-CU 2.4 and O-DU Grove-DU 5.3 connect to O-RU Kestrel-RU 1.8 over Open Fronthaul. The DU requests CP-B, while the RU advertises CP-A only.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation is rejected, and the RU does not enter the operational state.\\\"}, {\\\"configuration\\\": \\\"The O-CU, O-DU, and O-RU versions and connection from case 2 are retained. The DU request is changed from CP-B to CP-A, which is advertised by the RU.\\\", \\\"interoperability_result\\\": \\\"Profile negotiation completes, and the RU enters the operational state.\\\"}]\",\"final_answer\":\"The cases support a profile-compatibility condition: the DU's requested compression profile must be one the RU advertises for negotiation to complete in the configurations described. Case 1 completes with CP-A requested and advertised. Case 2 is rejected when CP-B is requested but only CP-A is advertised; case 3 completes after the request is changed to CP-A with the components retained. The evidence is limited to these profiles and configurations and does not establish that profile agreement alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.\",\"recurring_pattern\":\"In the listed configurations, negotiation completes when the DU-requested compression profile is among the profiles advertised by the RU. The one recorded mismatch is rejected, and changing the request to the advertised CP-A is followed by successful negotiation.\",\"supporting_evidence\":\"[{\\\"case_numbers\\\": [1], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The DU requests CP-A, the RU advertises CP-A, and negotiation completes with the RU operational.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [2], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"The DU requests CP-B while the RU advertises only CP-A; negotiation is rejected and the RU does not become operational.\\\"}, {\\\"case_numbers\\\": [3], \\\"observation\\\": \\\"With the case 2 components retained, changing the DU request to the RU-advertised CP-A is followed by completed negotiation and an operational RU.\\\"}]\",\"applicability_boundary\":\"This inference covers only the stated profile requests, advertisements, and component combinations. The cases do not establish behavior for other compression profiles, software versions, or negotiation settings, and they do not show that matching profiles alone guarantees end-to-end service operation.\"}","MOBIUSI INC","https:\u002F\u002Fstatic.mobiusi.com\u002Fmobiwusi\u002F20250829\u002F7bf4ac62b4533e2b809998a6f1c5491e.png?Expires=1792463130&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tH8MQqhgeiAtrzCHrxM&Signature=v6Tr8jBrdm4s5wU1SnnyGsYg%2Bhw%3D&x-oss-process=image%2Fresize%2Cm_fill%2Cw_35%2Ch_35",[673,679],{"type":674,"title":675,"count_data":676},"bar","Length distribution",[677],{"name":678,"value":483},"1k lower",{"type":680,"title":681,"count_data":682},"pie","Language distribution",[683],{"name":684,"value":483},"English"]