[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$apiParty6fBuHLCPZ1LTYs42XHdVbjpSDOYYPYzyxeAGwSN5Tp8":3,"$apiPartyFRCJ2s5Zc0mYInDl0tkKUjBdXruQtAwSOoSMYX5d7c0":563,"$apiPartyFRCJ2s5Zc0mYInDl0tkKUjBdXruQtAwSOoSMYX5d7c0$H93EERW16b":563},{"product_data":4,"scene_data":21,"task_data":407,"modality_data":441,"domain_data":478},[5,9,12,15,18],{"name":6,"value":7,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Rivo","1","",{"name":10,"value":11,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Cubo","2",{"name":13,"value":14,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Moye","3",{"name":16,"value":17,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Juro","4",{"name":19,"value":20,"add_value":8,"describe":8},"Ordo","5",[22,73,135,197,232,267,302,337,372],{"name":23,"value":7,"add_value":24,"describe":25,"children":26},"Home & Indoor","sofa","AI enhances everyday home life. Our datasets cover real indoor scenes to support smart devices, robotics, and home intelligence.",[27,29,31,33,35,37,40,43,46,49,52,55,58,61,64,67,70],{"name":28,"value":7},"Living Room",{"name":30,"value":11},"Bedroom",{"name":32,"value":14},"Kitchen",{"name":34,"value":17},"Dining Area",{"name":36,"value":20},"Bathroom",{"name":38,"value":39},"Entrance \u002F Foyer","6",{"name":41,"value":42},"Corridor \u002F Hallway","7",{"name":44,"value":45},"Staircase","8",{"name":47,"value":48},"Home Office","9",{"name":50,"value":51},"Hobby \u002F Game Room","10",{"name":53,"value":54},"Worship Space","11",{"name":56,"value":57},"Garage","12",{"name":59,"value":60},"Utility \u002F Laundry Room","13",{"name":62,"value":63},"Pantry","14",{"name":65,"value":66},"Basement","15",{"name":68,"value":69},"Garden","16",{"name":71,"value":72},"Balcony","17",{"name":74,"value":11,"add_value":75,"describe":76,"children":77},"Office & Educational","workshop","AI is reshaping work and learning. Our datasets capture offices and classrooms to power automation and next-generation productivity tools.",[78,81,84,87,90,93,96,99,102,105,108,111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132],{"name":79,"value":80},"Open Office","18",{"name":82,"value":83},"Private Office","19",{"name":85,"value":86},"Co-working Space","20",{"name":88,"value":89},"Reception \u002F Lobby","21",{"name":91,"value":92},"Conference Room","22",{"name":94,"value":95},"Huddle Room \u002F Booth","23",{"name":97,"value":98},"Lecture Hall \u002F Auditorium","24",{"name":100,"value":101},"Classroom","25",{"name":103,"value":104},"Science Laboratory","26",{"name":106,"value":107},"Library","27",{"name":109,"value":110},"Design Studio","28",{"name":112,"value":113},"Pantry \u002F Breakroom","29",{"name":115,"value":116},"Cafeteria \u002F Canteen","30",{"name":118,"value":119},"Restroom (Commercial)","31",{"name":121,"value":122},"Gymnasium \u002F Sports Hall","32",{"name":124,"value":125},"Server Room","33",{"name":127,"value":128},"Mailroom \u002F Logistics","34",{"name":130,"value":131},"Janitorial Closet","35",{"name":133,"value":134},"Corridor \u002F Elevators","36",{"name":136,"value":14,"add_value":137,"describe":138,"children":139},"Healthcare & Medical","love-and-help","AI is advancing modern healthcare. Our datasets include clinics and hospitals to enable clinical insights and medical automation.",[140,143,146,149,152,155,158,161,164,167,170,173,176,179,182,185,188,191,194],{"name":141,"value":142},"Operating Theatre \u002F OR","37",{"name":144,"value":145},"Consultation Room","38",{"name":147,"value":148},"Treatment Room","39",{"name":150,"value":151},"Dental Clinic","40",{"name":153,"value":154},"Inpatient Ward","41",{"name":156,"value":157},"Nurse Station","42",{"name":159,"value":160},"ICU","43",{"name":162,"value":163},"NICU (Neonatal ICU)","44",{"name":165,"value":166},"Emergency Room (ER)","45",{"name":168,"value":169},"Hospital Corridor","46",{"name":171,"value":172},"Waiting Area","47",{"name":174,"value":175},"CT\u002FMRI","48",{"name":177,"value":178},"Medical Laboratory","49",{"name":180,"value":181},"Phlebotomy Room","50",{"name":183,"value":184},"Rehabilitation Gym","51",{"name":186,"value":187},"Assisted Living Room","52",{"name":189,"value":190},"Pharmacy","53",{"name":192,"value":193},"Sterile Processing Dept","54",{"name":195,"value":196},"Medical Storage","55",{"name":198,"value":17,"add_value":199,"describe":200,"children":201},"Business & Public Service","business","AI is elevating commercial and public services. Our datasets span retail, dining, and service centers to improve intelligent operations.",[202,205,208,211,214,217,220,223,226,229],{"name":203,"value":204},"Shopping Mall Atrium","86",{"name":206,"value":207},"Supermarket Shelf","87",{"name":209,"value":210},"Self-Checkout Counter","88",{"name":212,"value":213},"Restaurant Dining Hall","89",{"name":215,"value":216},"Commercial Kitchen","90",{"name":218,"value":219},"Hotel Lobby","91",{"name":221,"value":222},"Subway Platform","92",{"name":224,"value":225},"Security Checkpoint","93",{"name":227,"value":228},"Underground Parking","94",{"name":230,"value":231},"Bank Teller Zone","95",{"name":233,"value":20,"add_value":234,"describe":235,"children":236},"Industrial & Manufacturing","robot-arm","AI is modernizing industry. Our datasets capture factories and logistics spaces to support robotics and intelligent manufacturing.",[237,240,243,246,249,252,255,258,261,264],{"name":238,"value":239},"Final Assembly Line","96",{"name":241,"value":242},"Quality Control Station","97",{"name":244,"value":245},"Robotic Welding Cell","98",{"name":247,"value":248},"CNC Machining Center","99",{"name":250,"value":251},"Cleanroom","100",{"name":253,"value":254},"Automated Warehouse","101",{"name":256,"value":257},"Loading Dock","102",{"name":259,"value":260},"Sorting Center","103",{"name":262,"value":263},"Chemical Plant","104",{"name":265,"value":266},"Power Substation","105",{"name":268,"value":39,"add_value":269,"describe":270,"children":271},"Transportation & Driving","car","AI is revolutionizing mobility. Our datasets capture road networks, vehicle dynamics and traffic scenarios to support autonomous driving and intelligent transportation systems.",[272,275,278,281,284,287,290,293,296,299],{"name":273,"value":274},"Urban Intersection","56",{"name":276,"value":277},"Highway \u002F Expressway","57",{"name":279,"value":280},"Tunnel","58",{"name":282,"value":283},"Roundabout","59",{"name":285,"value":286},"School \u002F Hospital Zone","60",{"name":288,"value":289},"Toll Station","61",{"name":291,"value":292},"Construction Zone","62",{"name":294,"value":295},"Parking Garage","63",{"name":297,"value":298},"Driver Cabin","64",{"name":300,"value":301},"Adverse Weather","65",{"name":303,"value":42,"add_value":304,"describe":305,"children":306},"Outdoor & Construction","tent-tree","AI is optimizing outdoor operations. Our datasets capture construction sites, open-air work zones and outdoor infrastructure to support smart construction and autonomous outdoor machinery.",[307,310,313,316,319,322,325,328,331,334],{"name":308,"value":309},"Excavation Site","66",{"name":311,"value":312},"Scaffolding Area","67",{"name":314,"value":315},"Material Storage Yard","68",{"name":317,"value":318},"Site Entrance","69",{"name":320,"value":321},"Roadwork Zone","70",{"name":323,"value":324},"Bridge Infrastructure","71",{"name":326,"value":327},"Transmission Line","72",{"name":329,"value":330},"Open-pit Mine","73",{"name":332,"value":333},"Tunneling Site","74",{"name":335,"value":336},"Post-Disaster Rubble","75",{"name":338,"value":45,"add_value":339,"describe":340,"children":341},"Nature, Aerial & Aquatic","global-loop","AI is exploring the natural world. Our datasets capture terrestrial landscapes, aerial vistas and aquatic ecosystems to support environmental monitoring and autonomous exploration systems.",[342,345,348,351,354,357,360,363,366,369],{"name":343,"value":344},"Deep Forest","76",{"name":346,"value":347},"Farmland \u002F Crops","77",{"name":349,"value":350},"River \u002F Lake","78",{"name":352,"value":353},"Open Ocean","79",{"name":355,"value":356},"Underwater Coral Reef","80",{"name":358,"value":359},"Fish Farm","81",{"name":361,"value":362},"Mountain Terrain","82",{"name":364,"value":365},"Urban Low Altitude","83",{"name":367,"value":368},"Fire Scene","84",{"name":370,"value":371},"Desert \u002F Gobi","85",{"name":373,"value":48,"add_value":374,"describe":375,"children":376},"Virtul & Digital","siri","AI is reshaping the virtual realm. Our datasets capture digital twins, virtual environments and simulated spaces to support metaverse development and intelligent digital interaction.",[377,380,383,386,389,392,395,398,401,404],{"name":378,"value":379},"VR Social Space","106",{"name":381,"value":382},"Synthetic Driving Sim","107",{"name":384,"value":385},"Digital Twin City","108",{"name":387,"value":388},"FPS \u002F MOBA Game","109",{"name":390,"value":391},"Robotics Gym","110",{"name":393,"value":394},"AR Navigation","111",{"name":396,"value":397},"Virtual Showroom","112",{"name":399,"value":400},"Code \u002F IDE Interface","113",{"name":402,"value":403},"App GUI Screen","114",{"name":405,"value":406},"Synthetic Face\u002FID","115",[408,411,414,417,420,423,426,429,432,435,438],{"name":409,"value":7,"add_value":410,"describe":8},"Classification","rubric",{"name":412,"value":11,"add_value":413,"describe":8},"Detection","radar",{"name":415,"value":14,"add_value":416,"describe":8},"Segmentation","segmentation",{"name":418,"value":17,"add_value":419,"describe":8},"Tacking","crosshairs",{"name":421,"value":20,"add_value":422,"describe":8},"Estimation","streamline",{"name":424,"value":39,"add_value":425,"describe":8},"QA","qa",{"name":427,"value":42,"add_value":428,"describe":8},"Recognition","finger-scan",{"name":430,"value":45,"add_value":431,"describe":8},"Control","control",{"name":433,"value":48,"add_value":434,"describe":8},"Extraction","extraction",{"name":436,"value":51,"add_value":437,"describe":8},"Retrieval","retrieval",{"name":439,"value":54,"add_value":440,"describe":8},"Forecast","forecast",[442,445,448,451,454,457,460,463,466,469,472,475],{"name":443,"value":7,"add_value":444,"describe":8},"Audio","audio",{"name":446,"value":11,"add_value":447,"describe":8},"Image","image",{"name":449,"value":14,"add_value":450,"describe":8},"Text","text",{"name":452,"value":17,"add_value":453,"describe":8},"Video","video",{"name":455,"value":20,"add_value":456,"describe":8},"Multi","multi",{"name":458,"value":39,"add_value":459,"describe":8},"Document","document",{"name":461,"value":42,"add_value":462,"describe":8},"Time-Series","time-series",{"name":464,"value":45,"add_value":465,"describe":8},"3D cloud","cloud",{"name":467,"value":48,"add_value":468,"describe":8},"Code","code",{"name":470,"value":51,"add_value":471,"describe":8},"Event","event",{"name":473,"value":54,"add_value":474,"describe":8},"Motion","motion",{"name":476,"value":57,"add_value":477,"describe":8},"Interaction","interaction",[479,482,487,491,494,499,504,509,514,519,524,528,532,536,540,544,548,552,556,559],{"id":480,"value":480,"name":233,"intro":481,"add_value":234,"describe":481},2,"智能质检：利用图像识别、多模态模型对产品外观或声音、振动等数据进行分析，自动识别缺陷，提高质量控制效率。\n工业知识问答与文档理解：通过大模型理解和总结技术文档、操作手册，实现快速问答、知识检索和培训支持。\n安全监测与风险预警：实时分析视频、传感器和操作日志，识别潜在危险行为或异常状态，提前预警，保障人员和设备安全。",{"id":483,"value":483,"name":484,"intro":485,"add_value":486,"describe":485},3,"Finance & Insurance","风险评估与预测：分析大量客户数据，评估信用风险、市场风险等，预测违约概率、股价走势等，辅助金融机构决策。\n智能投顾：根据客户风险偏好、资产状况等，提供个性化投资组合建议，实时调整投资策略。\n反欺诈检测：通过分析交易数据、用户行为，识别异常交易和欺诈行为，保障金融安全。","funds",{"id":488,"value":488,"name":489,"intro":490,"add_value":269,"describe":490},1,"Transport & Automotive","智能座舱：打造多模态交互的 AI 座舱，通过语音、手势、面部识别等实现人机交互，如语音控制导航、音乐播放。\n驾驶员状态监测：识别疲劳、分心、抽烟、打电话等行为，通过大模型判断危险等级，触发相应提醒或干预机制。\n智能驾驶：AI 用于环境感知、路径规划与决策控制，使车辆能识别道路、行人、障碍物等，实现自适应巡航、自动泊车、车道保持等功能，提升驾驶安全性与便利性。",{"id":492,"value":492,"name":136,"intro":493,"add_value":137,"describe":493},4,"医学影像诊断：分析 CT、MRI 等影像，辅助医生检测疾病、识别病灶，如 AI 系统可快速发现肺部结节。\n医患对话助手：通过自然语言处理理解患者问题，提供初步健康建议或就诊指导，缓解医生接诊压力。\n智能健康管理：根据用户健康数据，提供个性化健康建议、疾病预警，如智能手环结合 AI 分析用户运动、睡眠、心率等数据。",{"id":495,"value":495,"name":496,"intro":497,"add_value":498,"describe":497},6,"Smart Devices","多模态交互：支持语音、手势、眼神等多种交互方式，如 AI 眼镜可通过语音指令实现翻译、搜索功能。\n智能感知与处理：使设备能感知环境、理解用户需求，如智能音箱根据环境噪音自动调节音量。\n个性化服务：根据用户使用习惯和偏好，提供个性化功能与服务，如智能手表为用户定制运动健身计划。","microscope",{"id":500,"value":500,"name":501,"intro":502,"add_value":503,"describe":502},8,"Law & Government","智能法律问答：面向公众或企业用户，提供合规、劳动法、婚姻继承、知识产权等常见法律问题的智能解答。\n合同审查与风险识别：利用大模型分析合同内容，识别潜在风险条款、漏洞或不合理约定，提升合同审核质量。\n法律知识图谱构建：自动梳理法规、案例、条文之间的引用关系，构建语义化知识图谱，支持智能分析和推理。","hammer",{"id":505,"value":505,"name":506,"intro":507,"add_value":508,"describe":507},7,"Education & Training","个性化学习：根据学生学习进度、能力和知识掌握情况，推送个性化学习内容与练习，如智能辅导系统为学生制定专属学习计划。\n智能教学辅助：AI 助教协助教师进行作业批改、答疑解惑，还可分析教学数据，为教师提供教学反馈，优化教学方法。\n虚拟学习环境：利用 AI 创建虚拟实验、历史场景等，让学生沉浸式学习，如在虚拟化学实验室中进行实验操作。","degree-hat",{"id":510,"value":510,"name":511,"intro":512,"add_value":513,"describe":512},5,"Agriculture & Food","作物病虫害识别与防治：通过图像识别分析农作物叶片、果实等症状，识别病虫害类型，给出防治建议，减少产量损失。\n农产品质量检测：利用图像和传感器数据，识别果蔬等农产品的成熟度、外观缺陷，进行自动分级，提高市场竞争力。\n农情监测与预测：利用卫星遥感、气象和传感器数据，结合大模型预测作物长势、干旱、洪涝等农情变化。","ph-farm",{"id":515,"value":515,"name":516,"intro":517,"add_value":518,"describe":517},9,"Retail & E-commerce","智能客服：通过自然语言对话理解用户需求，提供产品推荐、订单查询、退换货支持等服务，提升客户满意度。\n个性化营销推荐：基于用户浏览、购买、偏好等行为数据，生成个性化推荐内容与优惠策略，提高转化率和客单价。\n商品内容生成：自动撰写商品标题、卖点描述、使用说明等内容，适用于海量SKU的内容生产与多语言发布。","buy",{"id":520,"value":520,"name":521,"intro":522,"add_value":523,"describe":8},10,"Security & Protection",null,"safe-shield-line",{"id":525,"value":525,"name":526,"intro":522,"add_value":527,"describe":8},11,"Environment & Climate","weather",{"id":529,"value":529,"name":530,"intro":522,"add_value":531,"describe":8},12,"Energy & Resource","energy-leaf",{"id":533,"value":533,"name":534,"intro":522,"add_value":535,"describe":8},13,"Express & Logistics","speed-outline",{"id":537,"value":537,"name":538,"intro":522,"add_value":539,"describe":8},15,"Sports","baseball-outline",{"id":541,"value":541,"name":542,"intro":522,"add_value":543,"describe":8},16,"General Data","daily-booth",{"id":545,"value":545,"name":546,"intro":522,"add_value":547,"describe":8},17,"Content & Media","media",{"id":549,"value":549,"name":550,"intro":522,"add_value":551,"describe":8},18,"Construction","construction",{"id":553,"value":553,"name":554,"intro":522,"add_value":555,"describe":8},19,"IT & Telecom","tech",{"id":557,"value":557,"name":558,"intro":522,"add_value":498,"describe":8},20,"Science & Research",{"id":560,"value":560,"name":561,"intro":522,"add_value":562,"describe":8},21,"Language & Culture","lang",{"id":564,"unique_code":565,"title":566,"icon":8,"intro":567,"cate":483,"detail":568,"create_time":569,"update_time":570,"price":571,"view_count":515,"download_count":572,"unit":572,"amount":573,"is_create_order":572,"enterprise_id":488,"seo_keywords":574,"seo_description":575,"data_format":576,"file_size":577,"apply_scene":578,"training_task":579,"version":580,"dataset_type_id":492,"dataset_scene_id":500,"sample_file":581,"banner":8,"unit_name":8,"cate_name":449,"icon_url":8,"banner_url":8,"sample_file_url":8,"data_dict":582,"qa_list":630,"sample_metadatas":647,"text_sample_content":690,"enterprise_name":691,"enterprise_logo":692,"data_distribution":693},1241,"549a7f09660085a787a43f157780296d","Patent Reexamination and Appeal Legal Evidence Retrieval Benchmark","Evaluate whether legal RAG systems can retrieve and connect direct evidence to disputed issues and decisions in patent reexamination and appeal documents.","\u003Cp>This benchmark contains legal documents from patent reexamination or appeal proceedings, including appeal briefs, responses, and decisions. It defines evidence retrieval tasks around disputed issues, decision reasoning, and adopted arguments, with annotations identifying direct support in the decision text and links between arguments and evidence. It supports evaluation of evidence localization, retrieval ranking, citation accuracy, and knowledge grounding in dense patent-law reasoning, as well as the development and validation of legal retrieval-augmented generation systems.\u003C\u002Fp>","2026-10-15 18:05:59","2026-10-19 17:20:01","0.00",0,5000,"patent reexamination dataset,patent appeal documents,legal evidence retrieval,patent decision evidence,legal RAG benchmark,legal issue retrieval,argument evidence linking,patent law documents","A benchmark for evidence retrieval from patent reexamination and appeal documents, with issue-focused tasks and evidence annotations for evaluating legal RAG.","JSON","0.2GB","patent reexamination, patent appeal proceedings, intellectual property dispute analysis","legal evidence retrieval, disputed issue identification, evidence-document matching","V1.0","rivo\u002Fsample-packages\u002F243b48a8-0a19-4aae-ab9c-cc786e5a5d63\u002F20261015.zip",[583,588,594,600,605,610,615,620,625],{"id":572,"name":584,"field":585,"intro":586,"type":587},"File Name","file_name","File name","string",{"id":589,"name":590,"field":591,"intro":592,"type":593},9058,"Normalized Evidence Spans","evidence_spans","Gold-standard supporting evidence organized as retrievable, locatable, and comparable text spans.","array",{"id":595,"name":596,"field":597,"intro":598,"type":599},9059,"Original Retrieval Task","evaluation_task","Input retrieval tasks focused on disputed issues, decision reasoning, or adopted arguments.","object",{"id":601,"name":602,"field":603,"intro":604,"type":599},9060,"Normalized Retrieval Task","normalized_task","Standardized disputed issues and retrieval targets derived from the original task and document content.",{"id":606,"name":607,"field":608,"intro":609,"type":599},9061,"Original Gold Annotations","gold_annotations","Human annotations of decision outcomes, direct supporting evidence, and adopted arguments for evaluating retrieval and evidence grounding.",{"id":611,"name":612,"field":613,"intro":614,"type":593},9062,"Source Legal Documents","source_documents","Original documents and text from patent reexamination or appeal proceedings, including appeal briefs, responses, and decisions.",{"id":616,"name":617,"field":618,"intro":619,"type":599},9063,"Retrieval Evaluation Results","retrieval_evaluation","Metrics calculated from gold-standard evidence and adopted arguments to assess system retrieval, citation, and evidence-linking performance.",{"id":621,"name":622,"field":623,"intro":624,"type":599},9064,"Retrieval System Submission","retrieval_submission","Ranked results, answers, and citations submitted by a retrieval or generation system for evaluation.",{"id":626,"name":627,"field":628,"intro":629,"type":593},9065,"Argument-Evidence Links","argument_evidence_links","Links between adopted arguments and their direct supporting evidence for evaluating knowledge-grounding capability.",[631,635,639,643],{"id":632,"question":633,"answer":634},6415,"What documents and tasks does the benchmark include?","The corpus covers appeal briefs, responses, and decisions from patent reexamination or appeal proceedings. Tasks retrieve evidence related to disputed issues, decision reasoning, and adopted arguments, with normalized retrieval targets and evidence spans.",{"id":636,"question":637,"answer":638},6416,"What capabilities can the gold annotations evaluate?","Human annotations include decision outcomes, direct support in the decision text, and adopted arguments, with links between arguments and evidence. They can be used to assess retrieval ranking, evidence localization, answer citations, and grounding quality.",{"id":640,"question":641,"answer":642},6417,"Which systems and research use cases is it suitable for?","It is suitable for patent-law retrieval and for developing or evaluating legal retrieval-augmented generation systems. It can also support comparisons of issue identification, direct-evidence recall, and citation accuracy in legal reasoning.",{"id":644,"question":645,"answer":646},6418,"How can the data be obtained, and what usage restrictions apply?","Refer to the dataset product page for availability and license terms. Before use, verify the permitted scope for document content, privacy requirements, and redistribution restrictions. Evaluation results should also be reviewed in the context of the intended legal task.",[648,664,677],{"id":649,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":651,"file_size":572,"file_name":652,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":654,"cate_name":655,"evidence_spans":656,"evaluation_task":657,"normalized_task":658,"gold_annotations":659,"source_documents":660,"retrieval_evaluation":661,"retrieval_submission":662,"argument_evidence_links":663},15123,"union_cubo",2106350984,"样例_3.json","json","{\"evidence_spans\": \"[{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the complete combination distinguishing feature\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The prior art does not disclose the processing chain of claim 1\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the synergistic technical effect produced by the combination\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The combination has a technical effect beyond simple addition\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define insufficient combination teaching and support the decision conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 1}]\", \"evaluation_task\": \"{\\\"query_text\\\": \\\"Please locate direct evidence in the reexamination decision that supports evaluating hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as a whole and, on that basis, finding claim 1 inventive.\\\", \\\"issue_description\\\": \\\"When hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier are separately known, whether combining them according to the processing chain of claim 1 produces a synergistic technical effect, and whether the prior art provides teaching for that combination.\\\", \\\"target_document_types\\\": [\\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"Response Brief\\\"], \\\"retrieval_scope\\\": \\\"Focus on retrieving the decision reasoning in D3 regarding the processing chain not disclosed by reference document 3, the low-illuminance recognition technical effect, overall evaluation, and combination teaching.\\\", \\\"evidence_requirements\\\": [\\\"The direct basis of the adjudicating body, rather than party arguments, should be located.\\\", \\\"Structural differences, synergistic technical effects, and technical teaching should be distinguished.\\\", \\\"It should be explained why a combination of separately known technical features can still involve an inventive step.\\\"]}\", \"normalized_task\": \"{\\\"normalized_query\\\": \\\"Locate the reexamination decision basis regarding the complete combination of hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing, the synergistic technical effect, and the lack of combination teaching.\\\", \\\"dispute_points\\\": [\\\"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete processing chain\\\", \\\"Whether hierarchical features and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole\\\", \\\"Whether the combination produces a technical effect that is not a simple addition\\\", \\\"Whether the prior art has teaching to combine according to the chain\\\"], \\\"decision_reasoning_targets\\\": [\\\"Distinguishing features and processing chain\\\", \\\"Principle of overall evaluation\\\", \\\"Synergistic technical effect\\\", \\\"Combination motivation and inventive step conclusion\\\"]}\", \"gold_annotations\": \"{\\\"decision_result\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"direct_evidence_annotations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm the distinguishing feature of the processing chain\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete combination of claim 1\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support synergistic technical effect and overall evaluation\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the combination of distinguishing features produces a technical effect beyond simple addition\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the prior art provides teaching to combine the distinguishing features\\\"}], \\\"adopted_arguments\\\": [{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1, and the steps should not be separated.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision explicitly takes the processing chain as the object of overall evaluation and finds that the combination produces an effect that is not a simple addition.\\\"}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fact that hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known does not mean that the prior art has motivation to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P4\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The decision distinguishes the two issues of whether individual technical means are known and whether the specific combination has technical teaching.\\\"}]}\", \"source_documents\": \"[{\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"A3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Request for a Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images. The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"R3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Response Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Response Opinion in the Image Recognition Device Reexamination\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier. The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"D3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision on the Invention Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole. Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier. Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 6}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 6}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 7}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 7}]}]\", \"retrieval_evaluation\": \"{\\\"hit_at_1\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_5\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_10\\\": 1, \\\"evidence_precision\\\": 0.75, \\\"evidence_recall\\\": 1, \\\"citation_accuracy\\\": 1, \\\"evaluation_summary\\\": \\\"The first four results cover all three direct bases of the decision, among which the first two accurately hit the synergistic effect and combination teaching; the third comes from a response brief but is consistent with the structural difference finding in the decision, and the fourth is a party summary. Therefore, the direct evidence recall is 100 percent, the direct evidence precision is calculated as 0.75 based on three direct hits among four returned results, and the submitted citations are all accurate.\\\"}\", \"retrieval_submission\": \"{\\\"ranked_results\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 1, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 2, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.96}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P1\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 3, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.72}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 4, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.55}], \\\"generated_answer\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision evaluates hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as the overall processing chain defined in claim 1. Reference document 3 does not disclose the combination of generating multi-level features according to edge directions and inputting each layer to the same classifier. This chain retains edge information in different directions, reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition of known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to this chain to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem, so claim 1 involves an inventive step.\\\", \\\"submitted_citations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports synergistic technical effect\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\\\"}]}\", \"argument_evidence_links\": \"[{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"This processing chain retains edge information in different directions and reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fact that the technical means are separately known does not mean that the prior art provides teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P4\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}]\"}","文本","[{\"source_ref\": \"D3#P2\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Define the complete combination distinguishing feature\", \"supports_argument\": \"The prior art does not disclose the processing chain of claim 1\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P3\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Define the synergistic technical effect produced by the combination\", \"supports_argument\": \"The combination has a technical effect beyond simple addition\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P4\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Define insufficient combination teaching and support the decision conclusion\", \"supports_argument\": \"Claim 1 involves an inventive step\", \"evidence_quality\": 1}]","{\"query_text\": \"Please locate direct evidence in the reexamination decision that supports evaluating hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as a whole and, on that basis, finding claim 1 inventive.\", \"issue_description\": \"When hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier are separately known, whether combining them according to the processing chain of claim 1 produces a synergistic technical effect, and whether the prior art provides teaching for that combination.\", \"target_document_types\": [\"Reexamination Decision\", \"Appeal Brief\", \"Response Brief\"], \"retrieval_scope\": \"Focus on retrieving the decision reasoning in D3 regarding the processing chain not disclosed by reference document 3, the low-illuminance recognition technical effect, overall evaluation, and combination teaching.\", \"evidence_requirements\": [\"The direct basis of the adjudicating body, rather than party arguments, should be located.\", \"Structural differences, synergistic technical effects, and technical teaching should be distinguished.\", \"It should be explained why a combination of separately known technical features can still involve an inventive step.\"]}","{\"normalized_query\": \"Locate the reexamination decision basis regarding the complete combination of hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing, the synergistic technical effect, and the lack of combination teaching.\", \"dispute_points\": [\"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete processing chain\", \"Whether hierarchical features and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole\", \"Whether the combination produces a technical effect that is not a simple addition\", \"Whether the prior art has teaching to combine according to the chain\"], \"decision_reasoning_targets\": [\"Distinguishing features and processing chain\", \"Principle of overall evaluation\", \"Synergistic technical effect\", \"Combination motivation and inventive step conclusion\"]}","{\"decision_result\": \"Claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"direct_evidence_annotations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D3#P2\", \"text_quote\": \"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm the distinguishing feature of the processing chain\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete combination of claim 1\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P3\", \"text_quote\": \"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Support synergistic technical effect and overall evaluation\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether the combination of distinguishing features produces a technical effect beyond simple addition\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P4\", \"text_quote\": \"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Support lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether the prior art provides teaching to combine the distinguishing features\"}], \"adopted_arguments\": [{\"argument_text\": \"Hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1, and the steps should not be separated.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"A3#P2\", \"D3#P1\", \"D3#P3\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The reexamination decision explicitly takes the processing chain as the object of overall evaluation and finds that the combination produces an effect that is not a simple addition.\"}, {\"argument_text\": \"The fact that hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known does not mean that the prior art has motivation to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"D3#P4\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The decision distinguishes the two issues of whether individual technical means are known and whether the specific combination has technical teaching.\"}]}","[{\"document_ref\": \"A3\", \"document_type\": \"Appeal Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Reexamination Request for a Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\", \"document_text\": \"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images. The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"A3#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images.\", \"page_number\": 4}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"A3#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\", \"page_number\": 4}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"R3\", \"document_type\": \"Response Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Response Opinion in the Image Recognition Device Reexamination\", \"document_text\": \"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier. The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"R3#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\", \"page_number\": 2}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"R3#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\", \"page_number\": 2}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"D3\", \"document_type\": \"Reexamination Decision\", \"document_title\": \"Reexamination Decision on the Invention Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\", \"document_text\": \"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole. Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier. Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"D3#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole.\", \"page_number\": 6}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D3#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\", \"page_number\": 6}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D3#P3\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\", \"page_number\": 7}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D3#P4\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"page_number\": 7}]}]","{\"hit_at_1\": 1, \"hit_at_5\": 1, \"hit_at_10\": 1, \"evidence_precision\": 0.75, \"evidence_recall\": 1, \"citation_accuracy\": 1, \"evaluation_summary\": \"The first four results cover all three direct bases of the decision, among which the first two accurately hit the synergistic effect and combination teaching; the third comes from a response brief but is consistent with the structural difference finding in the decision, and the fourth is a party summary. Therefore, the direct evidence recall is 100 percent, the direct evidence precision is calculated as 0.75 based on three direct hits among four returned results, and the submitted citations are all accurate.\"}","{\"ranked_results\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D3#P4\", \"rank\": 1, \"retrieved_text\": \"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.98}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P3\", \"rank\": 2, \"retrieved_text\": \"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.96}, {\"source_ref\": \"R3#P1\", \"rank\": 3, \"retrieved_text\": \"Although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.72}, {\"source_ref\": \"A3#P2\", \"rank\": 4, \"retrieved_text\": \"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.55}], \"generated_answer\": \"The reexamination decision evaluates hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as the overall processing chain defined in claim 1. Reference document 3 does not disclose the combination of generating multi-level features according to edge directions and inputting each layer to the same classifier. This chain retains edge information in different directions, reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition of known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to this chain to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem, so claim 1 involves an inventive step.\", \"submitted_citations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D3#P3\", \"quoted_text\": \"This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports synergistic technical effect\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D3#P4\", \"quoted_text\": \"The prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\"}]}","[{\"argument_text\": \"Hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D3#P1\", \"D3#P2\", \"D3#P3\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.98}, {\"argument_text\": \"This processing chain retains edge information in different directions and reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D3#P3\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}, {\"argument_text\": \"The fact that the technical means are separately known does not mean that the prior art provides teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D3#P4\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}]",{"id":665,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":666,"file_size":572,"file_name":667,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":668,"cate_name":655,"evidence_spans":669,"evaluation_task":670,"normalized_task":671,"gold_annotations":672,"source_documents":673,"retrieval_evaluation":674,"retrieval_submission":675,"argument_evidence_links":676},15122,1111288450,"样例_2.json","{\"evidence_spans\": \"[{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P2\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm specific disclosure of the original application\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The amendment feature has an original disclosure basis\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P3\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm the amendment does not exceed the scope\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The legality of the amendment is established\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P4\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm prior art differences and lack of technical teaching\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The amended claim involves an inventive step\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}]\", \"evaluation_task\": \"{\\\"query_text\\\": \\\"Please retrieve the direct basis on which the adjudicating body found that the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application and supported that the amended claim involves an inventive step.\\\", \\\"issue_description\\\": \\\"Whether adding the reversible locking member already disclosed in the specification to claim 1 constitutes an amendment beyond scope, and whether the amended structure involves an inventive step relative to reference document 2.\\\", \\\"target_document_types\\\": [\\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"Response Brief\\\"], \\\"retrieval_scope\\\": \\\"Retrieve paragraphs in D2 regarding the original specification disclosure, direct and unambiguous derivation, differences from the reference document, and technical teaching.\\\", \\\"evidence_requirements\\\": [\\\"The determination of amendment legality and the determination of inventive step must be distinguished.\\\", \\\"The direct basis of the adjudicating body should be located, covering the specification disclosure and prior art comparison.\\\", \\\"It should be explained which specific legal conclusion each piece of evidence supports.\\\"]}\", \"normalized_task\": \"{\\\"normalized_query\\\": \\\"Locate the adjudicative basis regarding the original disclosure of the reversible locking member, the amendment not exceeding the scope, and reference document 2 lacking the same structure and technical teaching.\\\", \\\"dispute_points\\\": [\\\"Whether the original specification explicitly discloses the reversible locking member and its function\\\", \\\"Whether the amended technical solution can be directly and unambiguously derived from the original application\\\", \\\"Whether reference document 2 discloses the same structural cooperation\\\", \\\"Whether the prior art provides technical teaching to solve the terminal loosening problem\\\"], \\\"decision_reasoning_targets\\\": [\\\"Basis in the original disclosure\\\", \\\"Determination of amendment scope\\\", \\\"Differences from prior art\\\", \\\"Inventive step conclusion\\\"]}\", \"gold_annotations\": \"{\\\"decision_result\\\": \\\"The amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application, amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"direct_evidence_annotations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P2\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm the disclosure basis of the amendment feature in the original application\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the reversible locking member was already disclosed in the original application documents\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P3\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support the legal finding that the amendment does not exceed scope\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P4\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support distinguishing features, technical teaching, and inventive step conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether amended claim 1 involves an inventive step\\\"}], \\\"adopted_arguments\\\": [{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses the reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position, and adding it to the claim does not constitute new technical content.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"A2#P1\\\", \\\"R2#P2\\\", \\\"D2#P2\\\", \\\"D2#P3\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The decision confirms that the original specification has explicit disclosure and that a skilled person can directly and unambiguously derive the amended technical solution.\\\"}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fixed buckle of reference document 2 cannot replace the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"D2#P4\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The decision clearly distinguishes the fixed buckle from the reversible locking structure and finds that the prior art does not provide corresponding technical teaching.\\\"}]}\", \"source_documents\": \"[{\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"A2\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief for a Patent Application for a Connector Having a Reversible Locking Structure\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the amendment submitted during examination only adds the reversible locking member explicitly disclosed in paragraph 0042 of the specification to claim 1, and does not introduce new technical content. The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A2#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the amendment submitted during examination only adds the reversible locking member explicitly disclosed in paragraph 0042 of the specification to claim 1, and does not introduce new technical content.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 3}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A2#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 3}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"R2\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Response Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Response Opinion in the Connector Patent Reexamination\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The examiner holds that the reversible locking member was not separately listed in the original claims, and the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application. The applicant responds that paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses this component in a manner combining structure and function.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R2#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The examiner holds that the reversible locking member was not separately listed in the original claims, and the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R2#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant responds that paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses this component in a manner combining structure and function.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"D2\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision on Amendment and Inventive Step of a Connector Patent Application\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"This case first requires determining whether amended claim 1 exceeds the scope of the original application. Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force. The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application. Regarding inventive step, reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"This case first requires determining whether amended claim 1 exceeds the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 5}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 5}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P3\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 5}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P4\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 6}]}]\", \"retrieval_evaluation\": \"{\\\"hit_at_1\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_5\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_10\\\": 1, \\\"evidence_precision\\\": 0.67, \\\"evidence_recall\\\": 1, \\\"citation_accuracy\\\": 1, \\\"evaluation_summary\\\": \\\"The first three results cover all three gold-standard evidence items, and the first two directly hit the amendment legality and inventive step determinations. Because the third result comes from the appeal brief rather than the direct basis of the decision, evidence precision is calculated as two thirds based on two direct hits among three returned results; the submitted citations accurately correspond to the decision paragraphs.\\\"}\", \"retrieval_submission\": \"{\\\"ranked_results\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P3\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 1, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.96}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P4\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 2, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.95}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"A2#P2\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 3, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.58}], \\\"generated_answer\\\": \\\"The adjudicating body holds that paragraph 0042 of the original specification already explicitly discloses the reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, and the amendment merely incorporates an existing structural feature into the claim, so it does not exceed the scope of the original application. Regarding inventive step, reference document 2 has only a fixed buckle, does not disclose the same structural cooperation, and does not provide technical teaching to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal, so amended claim 1 involves an inventive step.\\\", \\\"submitted_citations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P3\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports amendment legality\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D2#P4\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 2 does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide corresponding technical teaching.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports inventive step conclusion\\\"}]}\", \"argument_evidence_links\": \"[{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position are already disclosed in the original specification, and the amendment does not exceed scope.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D2#P2\\\", \\\"D2#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fixed buckle of reference document 2 cannot replace the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D2#P4\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide technical teaching to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D2#P4\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}]\"}","[{\"source_ref\": \"D2#P2\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm specific disclosure of the original application\", \"supports_argument\": \"The amendment feature has an original disclosure basis\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.98}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P3\", \"normalized_quote\": \"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm the amendment does not exceed the scope\", \"supports_argument\": \"The legality of the amendment is established\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P4\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm prior art differences and lack of technical teaching\", \"supports_argument\": \"The amended claim involves an inventive step\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}]","{\"query_text\": \"Please retrieve the direct basis on which the adjudicating body found that the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application and supported that the amended claim involves an inventive step.\", \"issue_description\": \"Whether adding the reversible locking member already disclosed in the specification to claim 1 constitutes an amendment beyond scope, and whether the amended structure involves an inventive step relative to reference document 2.\", \"target_document_types\": [\"Reexamination Decision\", \"Appeal Brief\", \"Response Brief\"], \"retrieval_scope\": \"Retrieve paragraphs in D2 regarding the original specification disclosure, direct and unambiguous derivation, differences from the reference document, and technical teaching.\", \"evidence_requirements\": [\"The determination of amendment legality and the determination of inventive step must be distinguished.\", \"The direct basis of the adjudicating body should be located, covering the specification disclosure and prior art comparison.\", \"It should be explained which specific legal conclusion each piece of evidence supports.\"]}","{\"normalized_query\": \"Locate the adjudicative basis regarding the original disclosure of the reversible locking member, the amendment not exceeding the scope, and reference document 2 lacking the same structure and technical teaching.\", \"dispute_points\": [\"Whether the original specification explicitly discloses the reversible locking member and its function\", \"Whether the amended technical solution can be directly and unambiguously derived from the original application\", \"Whether reference document 2 discloses the same structural cooperation\", \"Whether the prior art provides technical teaching to solve the terminal loosening problem\"], \"decision_reasoning_targets\": [\"Basis in the original disclosure\", \"Determination of amendment scope\", \"Differences from prior art\", \"Inventive step conclusion\"]}","{\"decision_result\": \"The amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application, amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"direct_evidence_annotations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D2#P2\", \"text_quote\": \"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm the disclosure basis of the amendment feature in the original application\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether the reversible locking member was already disclosed in the original application documents\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P3\", \"text_quote\": \"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Support the legal finding that the amendment does not exceed scope\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P4\", \"text_quote\": \"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Support distinguishing features, technical teaching, and inventive step conclusion\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether amended claim 1 involves an inventive step\"}], \"adopted_arguments\": [{\"argument_text\": \"Paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses the reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position, and adding it to the claim does not constitute new technical content.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"A2#P1\", \"R2#P2\", \"D2#P2\", \"D2#P3\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The decision confirms that the original specification has explicit disclosure and that a skilled person can directly and unambiguously derive the amended technical solution.\"}, {\"argument_text\": \"The fixed buckle of reference document 2 cannot replace the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"D2#P4\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The decision clearly distinguishes the fixed buckle from the reversible locking structure and finds that the prior art does not provide corresponding technical teaching.\"}]}","[{\"document_ref\": \"A2\", \"document_type\": \"Appeal Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Appeal Brief for a Patent Application for a Connector Having a Reversible Locking Structure\", \"document_text\": \"The applicant argues that the amendment submitted during examination only adds the reversible locking member explicitly disclosed in paragraph 0042 of the specification to claim 1, and does not introduce new technical content. The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"A2#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The applicant argues that the amendment submitted during examination only adds the reversible locking member explicitly disclosed in paragraph 0042 of the specification to claim 1, and does not introduce new technical content.\", \"page_number\": 3}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"A2#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\", \"page_number\": 3}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"R2\", \"document_type\": \"Response Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Response Opinion in the Connector Patent Reexamination\", \"document_text\": \"The examiner holds that the reversible locking member was not separately listed in the original claims, and the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application. The applicant responds that paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses this component in a manner combining structure and function.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"R2#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The examiner holds that the reversible locking member was not separately listed in the original claims, and the amendment exceeds the scope of the original application.\", \"page_number\": 2}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"R2#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The applicant responds that paragraph 0042 of the specification already discloses this component in a manner combining structure and function.\", \"page_number\": 2}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"D2\", \"document_type\": \"Reexamination Decision\", \"document_title\": \"Reexamination Decision on Amendment and Inventive Step of a Connector Patent Application\", \"document_text\": \"This case first requires determining whether amended claim 1 exceeds the scope of the original application. Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force. The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application. Regarding inventive step, reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"D2#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"This case first requires determining whether amended claim 1 exceeds the scope of the original application.\", \"page_number\": 5}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D2#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Paragraph 0042 of the original specification explicitly discloses providing a reversible locking member, and discloses that the locking member maintains the terminal position when the connector is subjected to a pulling force.\", \"page_number\": 5}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D2#P3\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\", \"page_number\": 5}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D2#P4\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"page_number\": 6}]}]","{\"hit_at_1\": 1, \"hit_at_5\": 1, \"hit_at_10\": 1, \"evidence_precision\": 0.67, \"evidence_recall\": 1, \"citation_accuracy\": 1, \"evaluation_summary\": \"The first three results cover all three gold-standard evidence items, and the first two directly hit the amendment legality and inventive step determinations. Because the third result comes from the appeal brief rather than the direct basis of the decision, evidence precision is calculated as two thirds based on two direct hits among three returned results; the submitted citations accurately correspond to the decision paragraphs.\"}","{\"ranked_results\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D2#P3\", \"rank\": 1, \"retrieved_text\": \"The amendment merely incorporates the structural feature already disclosed in that paragraph into claim 1, and a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.96}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P4\", \"rank\": 2, \"retrieved_text\": \"Reference document 2 discloses a fixed buckle, but does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide technical teaching to use this structure to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal. Amended claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.95}, {\"source_ref\": \"A2#P2\", \"rank\": 3, \"retrieved_text\": \"The amended claim 1 also has the effect of preventing terminal loosening during insertion and removal.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.58}], \"generated_answer\": \"The adjudicating body holds that paragraph 0042 of the original specification already explicitly discloses the reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, and the amendment merely incorporates an existing structural feature into the claim, so it does not exceed the scope of the original application. Regarding inventive step, reference document 2 has only a fixed buckle, does not disclose the same structural cooperation, and does not provide technical teaching to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal, so amended claim 1 involves an inventive step.\", \"submitted_citations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D2#P3\", \"quoted_text\": \"a person skilled in the art can directly and unambiguously derive this technical solution from the original application documents. Therefore, the amendment does not exceed the scope of the original application.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports amendment legality\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D2#P4\", \"quoted_text\": \"Reference document 2 does not disclose the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force, nor does it provide corresponding technical teaching.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports inventive step conclusion\"}]}","[{\"argument_text\": \"The reversible locking member and its function of maintaining the terminal position are already disclosed in the original specification, and the amendment does not exceed scope.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D2#P2\", \"D2#P3\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}, {\"argument_text\": \"The fixed buckle of reference document 2 cannot replace the structural cooperation in which the reversible locking member maintains the terminal position when subjected to a pulling force.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D2#P4\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.98}, {\"argument_text\": \"The prior art does not provide technical teaching to solve the problem of terminal loosening after repeated insertion and removal.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D2#P4\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}]",{"id":678,"relate_table":650,"relate_id":679,"file_size":572,"file_name":680,"path":8,"duration":572,"cate":483,"file_format":653,"audio_rate":8,"audio_channel":522,"audio_bit_depth":522,"quality":8,"annotation":681,"cate_name":655,"evidence_spans":682,"evaluation_task":683,"normalized_task":684,"gold_annotations":685,"source_documents":686,"retrieval_evaluation":687,"retrieval_submission":688,"argument_evidence_links":689},15121,1030437676,"样例_1.json","{\"evidence_spans\": \"[{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P2\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the control manner of the prior art\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 does not disclose predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P3\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm distinguishing features and technical effect\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"Predictive control is a distinguishing feature with actual technical effect\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P4\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm lack of technical teaching and reach conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}]\", \"evaluation_task\": \"{\\\"query_text\\\": \\\"Please retrieve evidence in the reexamination decision that directly supports that claim 1 involves an inventive step, and explain how the adjudicating body distinguishes current temperature threshold control from predicted temperature rise control.\\\", \\\"issue_description\\\": \\\"Whether the predicted temperature rise and advance adjustment of cooling power in claim 1 relative to reference document 1 constitute distinguishing features with technical effects, and whether the prior art provides corresponding technical teaching.\\\", \\\"target_document_types\\\": [\\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"Response Brief\\\"], \\\"retrieval_scope\\\": \\\"Focus on retrieving the reasoning paragraphs in D1 regarding the disclosure content of the reference document, distinguishing features, technical effects, and technical teaching.\\\", \\\"evidence_requirements\\\": [\\\"Direct quotations in the decision text should be located, not merely party arguments.\\\", \\\"The three reasoning links of distinguishing features, technical effects, and lack of technical teaching should be covered simultaneously.\\\", \\\"It should be explained how the evidence supports the inventive step conclusion.\\\"]}\", \"normalized_task\": \"{\\\"normalized_query\\\": \\\"Locate direct evidence in the reexamination decision regarding current temperature threshold control, predicted temperature rise control, and their technical teaching.\\\", \\\"dispute_points\\\": [\\\"What control manner is disclosed by reference document 1\\\", \\\"Whether predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance are distinguishing features\\\", \\\"Whether the distinguishing features produce the technical effect of reducing peak temperature\\\", \\\"Whether the prior art provides the corresponding technical teaching\\\"], \\\"decision_reasoning_targets\\\": [\\\"Disclosure content of the closest prior art\\\", \\\"Identification of distinguishing features\\\", \\\"Determination of technical effect\\\", \\\"Technical teaching and inventive step conclusion\\\"]}\", \"gold_annotations\": \"{\\\"decision_result\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"direct_evidence_annotations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P2\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the closest prior art and its control manner\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether reference document 1 has already disclosed predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P3\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm distinguishing features and their technical effect\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether predicted temperature rise control constitutes a distinguishing feature with technical effect\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P4\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support lack of technical teaching and the inventive step conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the prior art provides technical teaching to combine the distinguishing features\\\"}], \\\"adopted_arguments\\\": [{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 only starts and stops the fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose adjusting cooling power in advance based on predicted temperature rise.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"A1#P2\\\", \\\"D1#P2\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision confirms that reference document 1 uses current temperature threshold control, and accordingly identifies predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance as distinguishing features.\\\"}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Predictive control can reduce temperature lag caused by a sudden battery load increase and lower peak temperature.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"D1#P3\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The decision text explicitly records the technical effect produced by the predictive control and incorporates it into the inventive step assessment.\\\"}]}\", \"source_documents\": \"[{\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"A1\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief Regarding a Reexamination Request for a Battery Thermal Management System\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that claim 1 has at least the distinguishing feature of adjusting cooling power based on predicted temperature rise relative to reference document 1. Reference document 1 only starts and stops a fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose predicting temperature rise or adjusting cooling power in advance based on a prediction result.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A1#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that claim 1 has at least the distinguishing feature of adjusting cooling power based on predicted temperature rise relative to reference document 1.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A1#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 only starts and stops a fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose predicting temperature rise or adjusting cooling power in advance based on a prediction result.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"R1\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Response Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Response Opinion Regarding the Reexamination Request\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed. The applicant responds that conventional threshold control cannot solve the thermal inertia problem when battery load suddenly increases.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R1#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 1}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R1#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant responds that conventional threshold control cannot solve the thermal inertia problem when battery load suddenly increases.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 1}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"D1\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision on the Invention Patent Application for a Battery Thermal Management System\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The issue examined in this decision is whether claim 1 involves an inventive step relative to reference document 1. Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold. Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature. The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The issue examined in this decision is whether claim 1 involves an inventive step relative to reference document 1.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 3}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 3}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P3\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P4\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}]}]\", \"retrieval_evaluation\": \"{\\\"hit_at_1\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_5\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_10\\\": 1, \\\"evidence_precision\\\": 0.67, \\\"evidence_recall\\\": 0.67, \\\"citation_accuracy\\\": 1, \\\"evaluation_summary\\\": \\\"The first two results accurately hit two of the three gold-standard evidence items, covering the core reasoning of distinguishing features, technical effects, and technical teaching, but D1#P2 was not returned, so the direct evidence recall is two thirds. The submitted citations all correctly correspond to the source and reasoning role.\\\"}\", \"retrieval_submission\": \"{\\\"ranked_results\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P3\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 1, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.97}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P4\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 2, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.94}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"R1#P1\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 3, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.61}], \\\"generated_answer\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision holds that reference document 1 only discloses starting the fan when the current temperature exceeds a threshold, whereas claim 1 further predicts future temperature rise based on battery load and gradually increases cooling power in advance. This predictive control can reduce temperature lag and lower peak temperature. Because the prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply this predictive control to reference document 1, claim 1 involves an inventive step.\\\", \\\"submitted_citations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P3\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature; this predictive control produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports distinguishing features and technical effect\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D1#P4\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports inventive step conclusion\\\"}]}\", \"argument_evidence_links\": \"[{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 1 only starts and stops the fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose adjusting cooling power in advance based on predicted temperature rise.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D1#P2\\\", \\\"D1#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Predictive control can reduce temperature lag caused by a sudden battery load increase and lower peak temperature.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D1#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply predictive control to reference document 1.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D1#P4\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}]\"}","[{\"source_ref\": \"D1#P2\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Define the control manner of the prior art\", \"supports_argument\": \"Reference document 1 does not disclose predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.98}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P3\", \"normalized_quote\": \"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm distinguishing features and technical effect\", \"supports_argument\": \"Predictive control is a distinguishing feature with actual technical effect\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P4\", \"normalized_quote\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm lack of technical teaching and reach conclusion\", \"supports_argument\": \"Claim 1 involves an inventive step\", \"evidence_quality\": 0.99}]","{\"query_text\": \"Please retrieve evidence in the reexamination decision that directly supports that claim 1 involves an inventive step, and explain how the adjudicating body distinguishes current temperature threshold control from predicted temperature rise control.\", \"issue_description\": \"Whether the predicted temperature rise and advance adjustment of cooling power in claim 1 relative to reference document 1 constitute distinguishing features with technical effects, and whether the prior art provides corresponding technical teaching.\", \"target_document_types\": [\"Reexamination Decision\", \"Appeal Brief\", \"Response Brief\"], \"retrieval_scope\": \"Focus on retrieving the reasoning paragraphs in D1 regarding the disclosure content of the reference document, distinguishing features, technical effects, and technical teaching.\", \"evidence_requirements\": [\"Direct quotations in the decision text should be located, not merely party arguments.\", \"The three reasoning links of distinguishing features, technical effects, and lack of technical teaching should be covered simultaneously.\", \"It should be explained how the evidence supports the inventive step conclusion.\"]}","{\"normalized_query\": \"Locate direct evidence in the reexamination decision regarding current temperature threshold control, predicted temperature rise control, and their technical teaching.\", \"dispute_points\": [\"What control manner is disclosed by reference document 1\", \"Whether predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance are distinguishing features\", \"Whether the distinguishing features produce the technical effect of reducing peak temperature\", \"Whether the prior art provides the corresponding technical teaching\"], \"decision_reasoning_targets\": [\"Disclosure content of the closest prior art\", \"Identification of distinguishing features\", \"Determination of technical effect\", \"Technical teaching and inventive step conclusion\"]}","{\"decision_result\": \"Claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"direct_evidence_annotations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D1#P2\", \"text_quote\": \"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Define the closest prior art and its control manner\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether reference document 1 has already disclosed predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P3\", \"text_quote\": \"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Confirm distinguishing features and their technical effect\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether predicted temperature rise control constitutes a distinguishing feature with technical effect\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P4\", \"text_quote\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"evidence_role\": \"Support lack of technical teaching and the inventive step conclusion\", \"supports_issue\": \"Whether the prior art provides technical teaching to combine the distinguishing features\"}], \"adopted_arguments\": [{\"argument_text\": \"Reference document 1 only starts and stops the fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose adjusting cooling power in advance based on predicted temperature rise.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"A1#P2\", \"D1#P2\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The reexamination decision confirms that reference document 1 uses current temperature threshold control, and accordingly identifies predicting temperature rise and adjusting cooling power in advance as distinguishing features.\"}, {\"argument_text\": \"Predictive control can reduce temperature lag caused by a sudden battery load increase and lower peak temperature.\", \"adoption_status\": \"Adopted\", \"supporting_source_refs\": [\"D1#P3\"], \"decision_rationale\": \"The decision text explicitly records the technical effect produced by the predictive control and incorporates it into the inventive step assessment.\"}]}","[{\"document_ref\": \"A1\", \"document_type\": \"Appeal Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Appeal Brief Regarding a Reexamination Request for a Battery Thermal Management System\", \"document_text\": \"The applicant argues that claim 1 has at least the distinguishing feature of adjusting cooling power based on predicted temperature rise relative to reference document 1. Reference document 1 only starts and stops a fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose predicting temperature rise or adjusting cooling power in advance based on a prediction result.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"A1#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The applicant argues that claim 1 has at least the distinguishing feature of adjusting cooling power based on predicted temperature rise relative to reference document 1.\", \"page_number\": 2}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"A1#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Reference document 1 only starts and stops a fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose predicting temperature rise or adjusting cooling power in advance based on a prediction result.\", \"page_number\": 2}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"R1\", \"document_type\": \"Response Brief\", \"document_title\": \"Response Opinion Regarding the Reexamination Request\", \"document_text\": \"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed. The applicant responds that conventional threshold control cannot solve the thermal inertia problem when battery load suddenly increases.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"R1#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed.\", \"page_number\": 1}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"R1#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The applicant responds that conventional threshold control cannot solve the thermal inertia problem when battery load suddenly increases.\", \"page_number\": 1}]}, {\"document_ref\": \"D1\", \"document_type\": \"Reexamination Decision\", \"document_title\": \"Reexamination Decision on the Invention Patent Application for a Battery Thermal Management System\", \"document_text\": \"The issue examined in this decision is whether claim 1 involves an inventive step relative to reference document 1. Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold. Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature. The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"paragraphs\": [{\"paragraph_ref\": \"D1#P1\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The issue examined in this decision is whether claim 1 involves an inventive step relative to reference document 1.\", \"page_number\": 3}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D1#P2\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Reference document 1 discloses a temperature sensor, a controller, and a fan, and starts the fan when the detected current temperature exceeds a threshold.\", \"page_number\": 3}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D1#P3\", \"paragraph_text\": \"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\", \"page_number\": 4}, {\"paragraph_ref\": \"D1#P4\", \"paragraph_text\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"page_number\": 4}]}]","{\"hit_at_1\": 1, \"hit_at_5\": 1, \"hit_at_10\": 1, \"evidence_precision\": 0.67, \"evidence_recall\": 0.67, \"citation_accuracy\": 1, \"evaluation_summary\": \"The first two results accurately hit two of the three gold-standard evidence items, covering the core reasoning of distinguishing features, technical effects, and technical teaching, but D1#P2 was not returned, so the direct evidence recall is two thirds. The submitted citations all correctly correspond to the source and reasoning role.\"}","{\"ranked_results\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D1#P3\", \"rank\": 1, \"retrieved_text\": \"Claim 1 further requires predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature. This predictive control avoids temperature lag caused by a sudden load increase and produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.97}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P4\", \"rank\": 2, \"retrieved_text\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the reexamination request is granted.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.94}, {\"source_ref\": \"R1#P1\", \"rank\": 3, \"retrieved_text\": \"The examination opinion holds that the temperature sensor and fan controller are conventional components, and a skilled person can set the control threshold as needed.\", \"retrieval_score\": 0.61}], \"generated_answer\": \"The reexamination decision holds that reference document 1 only discloses starting the fan when the current temperature exceeds a threshold, whereas claim 1 further predicts future temperature rise based on battery load and gradually increases cooling power in advance. This predictive control can reduce temperature lag and lower peak temperature. Because the prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply this predictive control to reference document 1, claim 1 involves an inventive step.\", \"submitted_citations\": [{\"source_ref\": \"D1#P3\", \"quoted_text\": \"predicting future temperature rise based on changes in battery load and gradually increasing cooling power before reaching the predicted temperature; this predictive control produces the technical effect of reducing peak temperature.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports distinguishing features and technical effect\"}, {\"source_ref\": \"D1#P4\", \"quoted_text\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply the above predictive control to reference document 1.\", \"citation_role\": \"Supports inventive step conclusion\"}]}","[{\"argument_text\": \"Reference document 1 only starts and stops the fan based on a current temperature threshold, and does not disclose adjusting cooling power in advance based on predicted temperature rise.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D1#P2\", \"D1#P3\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.98}, {\"argument_text\": \"Predictive control can reduce temperature lag caused by a sudden battery load increase and lower peak temperature.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D1#P3\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}, {\"argument_text\": \"The prior art does not provide a technical teaching to apply predictive control to reference document 1.\", \"evidence_refs\": [\"D1#P4\"], \"relation_type\": \"Directly supports\", \"linkage_confidence\": 0.99}]","{\"evidence_spans\":\"[{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the complete combination distinguishing feature\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The prior art does not disclose the processing chain of claim 1\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define the synergistic technical effect produced by the combination\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"The combination has a technical effect beyond simple addition\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"normalized_quote\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Define insufficient combination teaching and support the decision conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_argument\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step\\\", \\\"evidence_quality\\\": 1}]\",\"evaluation_task\":\"{\\\"query_text\\\": \\\"Please locate direct evidence in the reexamination decision that supports evaluating hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as a whole and, on that basis, finding claim 1 inventive.\\\", \\\"issue_description\\\": \\\"When hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier are separately known, whether combining them according to the processing chain of claim 1 produces a synergistic technical effect, and whether the prior art provides teaching for that combination.\\\", \\\"target_document_types\\\": [\\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"Response Brief\\\"], \\\"retrieval_scope\\\": \\\"Focus on retrieving the decision reasoning in D3 regarding the processing chain not disclosed by reference document 3, the low-illuminance recognition technical effect, overall evaluation, and combination teaching.\\\", \\\"evidence_requirements\\\": [\\\"The direct basis of the adjudicating body, rather than party arguments, should be located.\\\", \\\"Structural differences, synergistic technical effects, and technical teaching should be distinguished.\\\", \\\"It should be explained why a combination of separately known technical features can still involve an inventive step.\\\"]}\",\"normalized_task\":\"{\\\"normalized_query\\\": \\\"Locate the reexamination decision basis regarding the complete combination of hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing, the synergistic technical effect, and the lack of combination teaching.\\\", \\\"dispute_points\\\": [\\\"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete processing chain\\\", \\\"Whether hierarchical features and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole\\\", \\\"Whether the combination produces a technical effect that is not a simple addition\\\", \\\"Whether the prior art has teaching to combine according to the chain\\\"], \\\"decision_reasoning_targets\\\": [\\\"Distinguishing features and processing chain\\\", \\\"Principle of overall evaluation\\\", \\\"Synergistic technical effect\\\", \\\"Combination motivation and inventive step conclusion\\\"]}\",\"gold_annotations\":\"{\\\"decision_result\\\": \\\"Claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"direct_evidence_annotations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Confirm the distinguishing feature of the processing chain\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether reference document 3 discloses the complete combination of claim 1\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support synergistic technical effect and overall evaluation\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the combination of distinguishing features produces a technical effect beyond simple addition\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"text_quote\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"evidence_role\\\": \\\"Support lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\\\", \\\"supports_issue\\\": \\\"Whether the prior art provides teaching to combine the distinguishing features\\\"}], \\\"adopted_arguments\\\": [{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Hierarchical feature extraction and the classifier should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1, and the steps should not be separated.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision explicitly takes the processing chain as the object of overall evaluation and finds that the combination produces an effect that is not a simple addition.\\\"}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fact that hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known does not mean that the prior art has motivation to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\\\", \\\"adoption_status\\\": \\\"Adopted\\\", \\\"supporting_source_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P4\\\"], \\\"decision_rationale\\\": \\\"The decision distinguishes the two issues of whether individual technical means are known and whether the specific combination has technical teaching.\\\"}]}\",\"source_documents\":\"[{\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"A3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Appeal Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Request for a Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images. The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The applicant argues that the hierarchical feature extraction module in claim 1 is not an ordinary image processing step, but instead first generates hierarchical features according to edge directions and then inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier, so as to reduce misrecognition in low-illuminance images.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 4}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"R3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Response Brief\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Response Opinion in the Image Recognition Device Reexamination\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier. The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The response opinion points out that although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The reduction in the low-illuminance misrecognition rate is the result of the combined action of this processing chain.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 2}]}, {\\\"document_ref\\\": \\\"D3\\\", \\\"document_type\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision\\\", \\\"document_title\\\": \\\"Reexamination Decision on the Invention Patent Application for an Image Recognition Device\\\", \\\"document_text\\\": \\\"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole. Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier. Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"paragraphs\\\": [{\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"The core issue in this case is whether the hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing defined in claim 1 should be evaluated as a whole.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 6}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, but does not disclose generating multiple levels of features according to edge directions and inputting the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 6}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 7}, {\\\"paragraph_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"paragraph_text\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"page_number\\\": 7}]}]\",\"retrieval_evaluation\":\"{\\\"hit_at_1\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_5\\\": 1, \\\"hit_at_10\\\": 1, \\\"evidence_precision\\\": 0.75, \\\"evidence_recall\\\": 1, \\\"citation_accuracy\\\": 1, \\\"evaluation_summary\\\": \\\"The first four results cover all three direct bases of the decision, among which the first two accurately hit the synergistic effect and combination teaching; the third comes from a response brief but is consistent with the structural difference finding in the decision, and the fourth is a party summary. Therefore, the direct evidence recall is 100 percent, the direct evidence precision is calculated as 0.75 based on three direct hits among four returned results, and the submitted citations are all accurate.\\\"}\",\"retrieval_submission\":\"{\\\"ranked_results\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 1, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are respectively known techniques, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem. Therefore, claim 1 involves an inventive step, and the original rejection decision is revoked.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 2, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Claim 1, through the above processing chain, retains edge information in different directions and can reduce the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images. This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.96}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"R3#P1\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 3, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"Although reference document 3 discloses convolutional feature extraction and a classifier, it does not disclose a processing chain that performs layering according to edge directions and inputs the features of each layer to the same classifier.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.72}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"A3#P2\\\", \\\"rank\\\": 4, \\\"retrieved_text\\\": \\\"The examination decision evaluated the technical features in isolation and ignored their synergistic relationship.\\\", \\\"retrieval_score\\\": 0.55}], \\\"generated_answer\\\": \\\"The reexamination decision evaluates hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing as the overall processing chain defined in claim 1. Reference document 3 does not disclose the combination of generating multi-level features according to edge directions and inputting each layer to the same classifier. This chain retains edge information in different directions, reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition of known steps. Although hierarchical extraction and the classifier are separately known, the prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to this chain to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem, so claim 1 involves an inventive step.\\\", \\\"submitted_citations\\\": [{\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P3\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"This effect is not obtained by simply adding together the known steps.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports synergistic technical effect\\\"}, {\\\"source_ref\\\": \\\"D3#P4\\\", \\\"quoted_text\\\": \\\"The prior art does not provide teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of claim 1 to solve the low-illuminance recognition problem.\\\", \\\"citation_role\\\": \\\"Supports lack of combination teaching and inventive step conclusion\\\"}]}\",\"argument_evidence_links\":\"[{\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"Hierarchical feature extraction and classification processing should be evaluated as a whole according to the processing chain defined in claim 1.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P1\\\", \\\"D3#P2\\\", \\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.98}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"This processing chain retains edge information in different directions and reduces the misrecognition rate in low-illuminance images, and the effect is not a simple addition.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P3\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}, {\\\"argument_text\\\": \\\"The fact that the technical means are separately known does not mean that the prior art provides teaching to combine them according to the processing chain of this case.\\\", \\\"evidence_refs\\\": [\\\"D3#P4\\\"], \\\"relation_type\\\": \\\"Directly supports\\\", \\\"linkage_confidence\\\": 0.99}]\"}","MOBIUSI INC","https:\u002F\u002Fstatic.mobiusi.com\u002Fmobiwusi\u002F20250829\u002F7bf4ac62b4533e2b809998a6f1c5491e.png?Expires=1792463130&OSSAccessKeyId=LTAI5tH8MQqhgeiAtrzCHrxM&Signature=v6Tr8jBrdm4s5wU1SnnyGsYg%2Bhw%3D&x-oss-process=image%2Fresize%2Cm_fill%2Cw_35%2Ch_35",[694,700],{"type":695,"title":696,"count_data":697},"bar","Length distribution",[698],{"name":699,"value":483},"1k lower",{"type":701,"title":702,"count_data":703},"pie","Language distribution",[704],{"name":705,"value":483},"English"]